Re: Rights in early RFCs

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sun, 16 June 2019 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064441201D4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 08:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsF8lsN1I_WP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 08:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B36512001A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 08:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4725 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2019 15:12:20 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 16 Jun 2019 15:12:20 -0000
Subject: Re: Rights in early RFCs
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20190615190833.EFAA0201593E4E@ary.qy> <41fdb057-547a-1901-22b7-99459c8a2990@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <8E62BC2B27B814095E7E051A@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <e94fd3ed-7ce7-515d-7a13-8330218de2f7@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 00:23:42 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8E62BC2B27B814095E7E051A@JcK-HP5.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-ZdTx6cZkGyx9n9hNJFbuTNnGxM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 15:23:44 -0000

John C Klensin wrote:

>> Free quotation is internationally permitted by Berne
>> convention:

> So, to gain insight into the status of a document written by an
> author living and working in the US, and published by a US
> institution that was doing its work under contracts that flowed
> from the US governmnet, we are citing a treaty which the US did
> not ratify/join until 1988 in support of what can be done with a
> document published in 1980,

Surely, the permission of the treaty on free quoting is applicable for
publication in US today, even though quoted text was written before
the treaty was ratified by US, though, anyway, in US,fair use has
been applicable.

> a document whose copyright has almost certainly expired?

What? Copyright with a natural person author expires at least 50
(75 in so many countries) years after death of the author.

> Colleagues, can an we please stop the amateur lawyering?

As a person who is paid partially because teaching copyright
for students, I fully agree with you.

However, a problem of most professional lawyers in some country
is that they do not have much knowledge on copyright act in
other countries.

But, they should have some, though often amateur level, knowledge
on Berne convention.

> It is
> not, at least IMO, helpful, nor does it address the question
> that, AFAICT, John Levine was asking when the thread started.

That some other SDO which originally asked the question is full of
amateur on legal issues is, IMHO, not a problem of IETF.

						Masataka Ohta