Re: Rights in early RFCs
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sun, 16 June 2019 08:24 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE681200E5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.634
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.634 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8YrV1oa3fsy9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6505012001E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45RS7m0BrKzwR34; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1560673492; bh=1fXOu8Wbr64a0hActWbgIl/wpVIbN1MP+WT4g9tHjUY=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=D4RZNyDTRI6OyV6mA1jLZo7H2XqiSxwuur02pO0AnZr/aSwbIak1NX/sdNMWJjIBG j2W1s0TOBEg7DI33pihnYwDm5pgiIu3FMym6BmqGybyzO+ebTYxDf3hvTkoJTDMKlG /XE9cQEPxdze6D5KJSxpkYAE85lDSgT4FHfXrm04=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [110.8.254.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45RS7k4V9pzwR32; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Rights in early RFCs
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <alpine.OSX.2.21.9999.1906141728410.11884@ary.qy> <A89856255D980EBDE462508F@PSB> <F1C084A6-BB9E-4AFB-AB31-C547FD0FEEE4@sobco.com> <A3DE5329-2B88-4FB4-A1D5-E85EEC409A08@vpnc.org> <CAHbuEH5qcpPmUa7TnY6UhsCJCGMYtPAW=F5uQOWrnZYVLrFmtA@mail.gmail.com> <c907cb94-98c2-8c7d-9d7f-4633d9bedfe2@network-heretics.com> <0A3F315FFC165D4643E9A581@PSB> <9695485d-2e00-a961-3209-0c9d1def684f@joelhalpern.com> <c8d2e072-171a-efa6-e388-92cca1a5cd36@network-heretics.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <bf41567c-a8dc-f6c1-eab2-e5e57853abca@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 17:24:47 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c8d2e072-171a-efa6-e388-92cca1a5cd36@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lurVpfZmnq7QJCtT6wWRHPacg8Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 08:24:53 -0000
The Trust Legal Provisions give everyone the right to "to copy, publish, display and distribute unmodified portions of IETF Contributions and IETF Documents". That seems pretty clear to me. They have to attribute it properly. And they have to keep our legends. (Which they may not have gotten quite right, and is one of the things the trust will need to make sure they do get right.) Given that the wording says "portions", I do not see that we can complain about their copying several portions. If the community wants to change that, then it needs to say so. As far as I know, these have been the rules for quite some time. Yours, Joel On 6/16/19 4:18 AM, Keith Moore wrote: > On 6/16/19 1:26 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > >> I think there are two separate issues. >> >> First, the way they structured their profile, they were making >> verbatim quotes, and then putting there own text around taht. As far >> as I can tell, in terms of our copyright rules, we have said they have >> the right to do that. I believe the trust will have to tell them that >> they have those rights. > > I'm not sure that's actually true. What's fairly clear (for various > reasons) is that they are free to reproduce the document in its > entirety. It's not clear (to me at least) that they are free to > produce derivative works. As for quoting, they may have some right to > do that in the US under fair use doctrine, but only for specific > purposes and within certain boundaries. And the boundaries of fair use > are for the courts to decide, not the trust. > > Keith > >
- Rights in early RFCs John R Levine
- Re: Rights in early RFCs John C Klensin
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Scott Bradner
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Paul Hoffman
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Rights in early RFCs John R Levine
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Joe Touch
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Joe Touch
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Miles Fidelman
- Re: Rights in early RFCs John C Klensin
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Keith Moore
- Re: Rights in early RFCs John Levine
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Keith Moore
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Salz, Rich
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Masataka Ohta
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Masataka Ohta
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Michael StJohns
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Keith Moore
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Keith Moore
- Re: Rights in early RFCs John C Klensin
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Joe Touch
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Masataka Ohta
- Re: Rights in early RFCs John Levine
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Michael StJohns
- Re: Rights in early RFCs Masataka Ohta