IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Thu, 20 June 2013 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278C921F9F8A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJEq0Bej6bj0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dougbarton.us (dougbarton.us [208.79.90.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE88921F9F4E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:d:5e7:224:e8ff:fe30:109b] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:d:5e7:224:e8ff:fe30:109b]) by dougbarton.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFC2B22B6A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dougbarton.us; s=dougbarton.us; t=1371750264; bh=TirxROl0nhNlfFUgT0P0IXWC9uZ6Nv5RJLh2TpdO0/g=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=k6v3cv/fxUwTar8rhCetO6IGpLhp/IUHehmLoOV8PmOEizoe8VkSns3OjH9tOr6JN JpUs1b4zDlW79KvaiKL1QdwAAdLvWPDyLEXrx+qczNbRuFD8XJjvXH0UIBrMLH0tDm Op55r+LJnLqOhJ29G4JEi35usei78zjArKIlfbu4=
Message-ID: <51C33F77.8020500@dougbarton.us>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:44:23 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard
References: <20130520134442.30045.33596.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51C1B235.6020507@bogus.com> <E8415CD2-AC5F-47CF-B740-65C45B181AC8@ogud.com> <FA4B2D6DB820F27675F8E13B@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20130620163611.GB41900@mx1.yitter.info> <51C33636.2040104@dougbarton.us> <20130620172705.GE41900@mx1.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20130620172705.GE41900@mx1.yitter.info>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:44:31 -0000

On 06/20/2013 10:27 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:04:54AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Perhaps we could have a non-WG mailing list so that people could
>> submit proposals for review prior to the expert review process.
>
> The WG list isn't going away with the WG.  The list is explicitly
> called out as a good place to try out proposals, so people can in fact
> do that today.

I would argue that a fresh start here might be appropriate, although I 
wouldn't argue it strongly, and wouldn't object to using dnsext@ if that 
was the consensus.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email