IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 20 June 2013 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54FF21F9D12 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6N2bN5xThCmv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873BE21F9D1C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (nat-07-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4D638A031 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:27:06 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:27:05 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <20130620172705.GE41900@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20130520134442.30045.33596.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51C1B235.6020507@bogus.com> <E8415CD2-AC5F-47CF-B740-65C45B181AC8@ogud.com> <FA4B2D6DB820F27675F8E13B@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20130620163611.GB41900@mx1.yitter.info> <51C33636.2040104@dougbarton.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51C33636.2040104@dougbarton.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:27:35 -0000

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:04:54AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:

> Perhaps we could have a non-WG mailing list so that people could
> submit proposals for review prior to the expert review process.

The WG list isn't going away with the WG.  The list is explicitly
called out as a good place to try out proposals, so people can in fact
do that today.

Best,

A
-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email