IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 13 June 2013 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A9821F9815 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u+SGoR6IWcRD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16D821F9967 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 08:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Un9rx-0001cF-B2; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:55:26 +0000
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:55:22 +0200
Message-ID: <m2obbaovit.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <51B9E7B4.5080404@bogus.com>
References: <20130520134442.30045.33596.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51A37E8A.9010506@bogus.com> <51B9E7B4.5080404@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:55:29 -0000

> I am told that draft has been revved again in response to discussion on 
> the list.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-05
> 
> Please direct your attention to the security considerations section. If 
> it turns out that informational documentation of the two RR-Type 
> assignments remains controversial, I will likely withdraw my sponsorship 
> of this draft.

the addition of 

    This document recommends that EUI-48 or EUI-64 addresses SHOULD NOT
    be published in the public DNS.

alleviates my worst fears.  though i wish it was a MUST NOT, i will not
insist.

thanks joe and joel.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email