IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Thu, 20 June 2013 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDC521F9C9A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SwsZFQx88mGr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp78.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp78.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0928E21F9C97 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 93CF31E80F8; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:39:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp2.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 5E55F1E80FC; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:39:15 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <51C1B235.6020507@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:39:20 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E8415CD2-AC5F-47CF-B740-65C45B181AC8@ogud.com>
References: <20130520134442.30045.33596.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51C1B235.6020507@bogus.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:39:22 -0000

On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:29 AM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:

> Given that this document was revved twice and had it's requested status change during IETF last call in response to discussion criticism and new contribution I am going to rerun the last call.


I reviewed this version and I think this is a fine document that I support. 
In particular the document goes out of its way to address the issues raised in prior 
IETF last call to the extent possible. 
The document is going to be the specification of two DNS RRtypes that have been allocated via expert review, we (DNS community) want to encore
that any such allocations be published as RFC's for future references. 

This document is not a product of any working group.

	Olafur (DNSEXT co-chair)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email