IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 20 June 2013 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC5221F9E3E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48fT+9k0hXTc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com (exprod7og116.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD71B21F9D30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUcM3fdxTRGbR86YkvP04H8m+Oh27SMP2@postini.com; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:10:21 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584371B80D8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D68A19005D; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:10:21 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHObdhdqMBwr1nU6UKUzsJ1CVzyUJk/S70A
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:10:20 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B6307751E3376@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <20130520134442.30045.33596.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51C1B235.6020507@bogus.com> <E8415CD2-AC5F-47CF-B740-65C45B181AC8@ogud.com> <FA4B2D6DB820F27675F8E13B@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20130620163611.GB41900@mx1.yitter.info> <51C33636.2040104@dougbarton.us>
In-Reply-To: <51C33636.2040104@dougbarton.us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <5B390800AC0F2B468D26548AB72981A7@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:10:31 -0000

On Jun 20, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> wrote:
> Perhaps we could have a non-WG mailing list so that people could submit proposals for review prior to the expert review process. Even some of the "get off my lawn" crowd offered good suggestions for this EUI case (make 1 record with a size field rather than 2 records) that could have made this whole process a lot smoother.

You mean like "namedroppers"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email