Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

I am told that draft has been revved again in response to discussion on 
the list.

http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-05

Please direct your attention to the security considerations section. If 
it turns out that informational documentation of the two RR-Type 
assignments remains controversial, I will likely withdraw my sponsorship 
of this draft.

Thanks
joel


On 5/27/13 5:40 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 5/20/13 6:44 AM, The IESG wrote:
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
>> the following document:
>> - 'Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS'
>>    <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> I would direct the attention of the commentors to draft 04
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-04.txt 
>
>
> Which addresses concerns expressed in IETF last call over the intended 
> status.
>
> It also incorporates edits proposed by John Klensin in his review.
>
> Notes: from the author:
>
>  - changed intended status to informational
>
>  - incorporation of John's suggestions in the Terminology section, to 
> indicate that we're using 2119 keywords even though this is not a 
> standards track document
>
>  - added a couple of sentences to the security considerations sections 
> to underscore the fact that this document specifies optional 
> mechanisms that people might well not use if privacy considerations 
> dictate otherwise
>
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> [e-mail] mailing lists by 2013-06-17. Exceptionally, comments 
>> may be
>> sent to [e-mail] instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>>
>>     48-bit Extended Unique Identifiers (EUI-48) and 64-bit Extended
>>     Unique Identifiers (EUI-64) are address formats specified by the 
>> IEEE
>>     for use in various layer-2 networks, e.g. ethernet.
>>
>>     This document defines two new DNS resource record types, EUI48 and
>>     EUI64, for encoding ethernet addresses in the DNS.
>>
>
>
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes/
>>
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes/ballot/ 
>>
>>
>>
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>
>>
>