Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Tue, 29 April 2014 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2201A0972 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eSUDoPGAbLM7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD541A04F1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p9so511401lbv.17 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=FbjBhtAX/WSuWCTGizakBGliFK/C0YhqUc0HBrdBIQo=; b=JRsHYDeWqbDj0l9lRwDYKU/NziBsdFEiYa3ei+ng7jKus8fwhbCKtLYAphCqj3hKq8 gzRr7m+P29anqFlEyCF15lyl3mz4JmAH81igqsY2uJzGmRGJZA65yF/gLB6RcvQdJmn6 8EEvdlgaZpfWlN8DFS9v88b18761G3Rh3r3J6o+QAedexS70nH+ZkRWdqezOvMWS/RMg UPck6kWUkGnyD5DSSjlWNkeFO7F0VhX0BfLbBSC2q7YykwxdHh4EX7d8GV4P7Lc67h85 PS4Wnf56xpZHojtxwU5YkpuvyQQH2w5MestudMxcyncZ8nV+548V1pG/2ZsfcGMj9njt 3N1g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.137.5 with SMTP id qe5mr707077lbb.16.1398799829921; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.95.74 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404291512550.3309@joyce.lan>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404291512550.3309@joyce.lan>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:30:29 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: yLH8Lx-yKf4UbeKL07XUKUKBbVI
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaZhoWkaKpscm4YA4F-kSpt9tvjhax8f6soJzaY-Q0SsnA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/15z_Y6katyNTm8Brb6GWGnJyghQ
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:30:33 -0000
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > I see that google.com now publishes a DMARC policy of p=quarantine. > > While this won't bounce people off lists like p=reject does, it still makes > it fairly pointless to post to this or any other list from a google.com google.com or gmail.com ? (corporate users or regular-old-consumer-gmail-users) > address, since no recipients hosted at Google, Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL, Comcast, > or other large providers will see it. > > If you're at Google, you might want to find yourself a less broken address, > and perhaps ask the people in your mail team if their intention was to tell > you not to particpate in the IETF on work time. > > Regards, > John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. >
- Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon John R Levine
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon Christopher Morrow
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon Paul Ferguson
- RE: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon Miles Fidelman
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon Tony Hansen
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon Rolf E. Sonneveld
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon ned+ietf
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon Rolf E. Sonneveld
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon ned+ietf
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon John Levine
- Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon Michael Richardson