IETF Logo Mail Archive

Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 29 April 2014 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B101A0939 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.843
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.843 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fNz_9a2k6A5x for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F0B1A048C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 83947 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2014 19:16:06 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=147ea.535ffa76.k1404; bh=uiuoYTbv/LN7B4Nn53CCxyItKGJI9H09GaXuQQ4UQqs=; b=Y20MQokJy0CFRVJlXJKD5we/FclQwPhqhHsmPPwkKm09C5gTg/9d8eIbGY4phsxyFk0MCZZMDXOTxMUmj2bMjefYxpAMBJbnfZ1ktfMXVidtswZ2JQsNSQbd/dTSSQvVRPQsEfWgfKGuE0mdGuL9jdIAad5CfqTcQyY+ciYuiuHIZHjfx8gg5s6MTYHe5IG0IR116clK1HU57nYou2HY1AB6uCBiCu2ay0uoA9fS43Ppm3/ZPnljbBFYNv2JGr2K
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=147ea.535ffa76.k1404; bh=uiuoYTbv/LN7B4Nn53CCxyItKGJI9H09GaXuQQ4UQqs=; b=UE54bwv0QIMLZ12bLtZXVybtg653tVyvRdgRZUzIJ9XIZ8NpWeV1dskzTLU5/oaEkjoKO+vYfUt5USzLM7sKbnpk62DiBd/Xw9CuiZAwod8E7OrECoOOnI+lqBi3H8wx0j7hcg8vXl9bc8Qbc4sjDXPEQ+D9GC6pZp4xRaEk+dArKU6VXTXs8lG+7AYcIXZWtsx0b/eJ5yirPcXZJtQwoVqkT1bzA52+YIfcldX4N/MJJaXzT3WHiTH7Kc/SF7ah
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 29 Apr 2014 19:16:05 -0000
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:16:05 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404291512550.3309@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3ITRnqV1jwKQbMWyhtHz18pM4cM
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:16:13 -0000

I see that google.com now publishes a DMARC policy of p=quarantine.

While this won't bounce people off lists like p=reject does, it still 
makes it fairly pointless to post to this or any other list from a 
google.com address, since no recipients hosted at Google, Hotmail, Yahoo, 
AOL, Comcast, or other large providers will see it.

If you're at Google, you might want to find yourself a less broken 
address, and perhaps ask the people in your mail team if their intention 
was to tell you not to particpate in the IETF on work time.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email