IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon

Paul Ferguson <fergie@people.ops-trust.net> Tue, 29 April 2014 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fergie@people.ops-trust.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4D61A09C0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.353
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.353 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2TnOE3Z5zKU0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from people.ops-trust.net (people.usa5.ops-trust.net [199.168.91.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D498E1A09B5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.155] (unknown [64.122.169.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fergie) by people.ops-trust.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61F701468003; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <535FFE6C.3040006@people.ops-trust.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:00 -0700
From: Paul Ferguson <fergie@people.ops-trust.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404291512550.3309@joyce.lan> <CAL9jLaZhoWkaKpscm4YA4F-kSpt9tvjhax8f6soJzaY-Q0SsnA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZhoWkaKpscm4YA4F-kSpt9tvjhax8f6soJzaY-Q0SsnA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VdWcvV1nt2UmLmyIdUf9-BHju40
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:33:05 -0000

Below:

On 4/29/2014 12:30 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>> I see that google.com now publishes a DMARC policy of p=quarantine.
>>
>> While this won't bounce people off lists like p=reject does, it still makes
>> it fairly pointless to post to this or any other list from a google.com
> 
> google.com or gmail.com ?
> 
> (corporate users or regular-old-consumer-gmail-users)

google.com:

https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-inspector/google.com

- ferg

> 
>> address, since no recipients hosted at Google, Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL, Comcast,
>> or other large providers will see it.
>>
>> If you're at Google, you might want to find yourself a less broken address,
>> and perhaps ask the people in your mail team if their intention was to tell
>> you not to particpate in the IETF on work time.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
>> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
>>
> 


-- 
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email