IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Tue, 29 April 2014 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8F51A093B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.33
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHlc2ZGJ3cpn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from egssmtp01.att.com (egssmtp01.att.com [144.160.112.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE2F1A08D8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:00:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by egssmtp01.att.com ( egs 8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3TL0j5s017220 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:00:46 -0500
Received: from vpn-135-70-100-208.vpn.swst.att.com ([135.70.100.208]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20140429210044gw100j0cole>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:00:44 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.100.208]
Message-ID: <536012FC.9020803@att.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:00:44 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404291512550.3309@joyce.lan> <CAL9jLaZhoWkaKpscm4YA4F-kSpt9tvjhax8f6soJzaY-Q0SsnA@mail.gmail.com> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D5DE7D@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <536011BD.3050704@meetinghouse.net>
In-Reply-To: <536011BD.3050704@meetinghouse.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/d1gz60nut4aHprww3DI1oyClIIo
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:00:49 -0000

On 4/29/14, 4:55 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>>> I see that google.com now publishes a DMARC policy of p=quarantine.
>>>>
>>>> While this won't bounce people off lists like p=reject does, it still
>>>> makes it fairly pointless to post to this or any other list from a
>>>> google.com
>>>
>
> Ahh... so we can't expect to see Vint in any of the ietf discussions 
> in the near future!

Anyone with mail servers that look at the dmarc settings won't see 
postings. People behind mail servers that do NOT look at the dmarc 
settings will see the postings just fine.

     Tony Hansen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email