IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon

"MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com> Tue, 29 April 2014 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <MHammer@ag.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76391A09C5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3hxurWiFWjsY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from agwhqht.amgreetings.com (agwhqht.amgreetings.com [207.58.192.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816EF1A09C4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com ([fe80::f5de:4c30:bc26:d70a]) by USCLES532.agna.amgreetings.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:33:23 -0400
From: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: RE: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
Thread-Topic: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
Thread-Index: AQHPY9+DSMV5W6CvEEmqi04fVoCH6JspPkOA//+9pHA=
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:33:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0507D5DE7D@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404291512550.3309@joyce.lan> <CAL9jLaZhoWkaKpscm4YA4F-kSpt9tvjhax8f6soJzaY-Q0SsnA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZhoWkaKpscm4YA4F-kSpt9tvjhax8f6soJzaY-Q0SsnA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.144.15.231]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rigBI3kzMu_rluXEBbESCIh7GTk
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:33:27 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 3:30 PM
> To: John R Levine
> Cc: IETF general list
> Subject: Re: Google.com hops on the DMARC bandwagon
> 
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> > I see that google.com now publishes a DMARC policy of p=quarantine.
> >
> > While this won't bounce people off lists like p=reject does, it still
> > makes it fairly pointless to post to this or any other list from a
> > google.com
> 
> google.com or gmail.com ?
> 
> (corporate users or regular-old-consumer-gmail-users)
> 

Gmail.com is still p=none.

> > address, since no recipients hosted at Google, Hotmail, Yahoo, AOL,
> > Comcast, or other large providers will see it.
> >
> > If you're at Google, you might want to find yourself a less broken
> > address, and perhaps ask the people in your mail team if their
> > intention was to tell you not to particpate in the IETF on work time.
> >
> > Regards,
> > John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email