Enough DMARC whinging

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Tue, 29 April 2014 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7F91A09D8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UFffV6Otezw4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3931A09D7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e16so521490lan.41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=teTVFFmJZo/hp2Iox3GTjJM4fpA/NzkammIB+ucz3ek=; b=LEzZzatYnSxCBOrtJqS8mYQpBxIZkCBHuocXcsQToeijtdbbP3LM+7YaOsBi/yfOEK qPB6HOac0XtACT3x+2RBsiLzJ7zFAtyV3jPtaIPwrqzSo79v2Hm49FV0ceNv6UJpr0aF EGVl2YS/XQCKVgNEyWW01x1TWCSPbuR+S/E/foXCErFJTKj8DMQtJe8T1e9hKym6xVac 6jYBW8c6+ZiUrt06uzoFOOtx8NMuDIzONxnKirx08QfGQ+bPlJmfo2exMnmGVD3/iqg9 1k2HEHvU8ePtv5Hf/pvHI99jnXTAIfevC5e6khDqgoZP1w/7RCa4GEhAKOPB6jg30sRU sBQw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.156.105 with SMTP id wd9mr4653lbb.68.1398801295443; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.234.229 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:54:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwh0Sc2wtvjEAjOMi4emDzyF4JWmmzYr5QEFcmyoKtkTAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Enough DMARC whinging
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NJ-w04RJ9575Nr6IDjj0kCkuU7k
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:54:59 -0000

I am finding it rather hard to follow the DMARC discussion. Some folk
have managed to convince me that they are upset but working out why
would require rather a lot of spec crunching.

My best theory so far is that DMARC is some sort of email policy
statement and that either (1) some companies are now publishing a
policy that states 'reject all mail that purports to come from this
address that does not have authentication Y' or (2) some companies are
now rejecting mail not in compliance with said policy or (3) both.

There is a simple truth about DNS names: Whoever owns them makes the
rules for their use [1]. If you don't like the rules for google.com
then choose another domain to post from.


If people want email to work with mailing lists, then don't complain
about reasonable choices people want to make. Work out a way to fix
mailing lists so that they work properly.

There is no reason we can't change the way From works. Or add new from headers.

Are we engineers or curators of the past?


[1] Thus be rather suspicious of folk who claim that we merely rent
the use on terms of their choosing.

-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/