Enough DMARC whinging
Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Tue, 29 April 2014 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7F91A09D8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UFffV6Otezw4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3931A09D7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e16so521490lan.41 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=teTVFFmJZo/hp2Iox3GTjJM4fpA/NzkammIB+ucz3ek=; b=LEzZzatYnSxCBOrtJqS8mYQpBxIZkCBHuocXcsQToeijtdbbP3LM+7YaOsBi/yfOEK qPB6HOac0XtACT3x+2RBsiLzJ7zFAtyV3jPtaIPwrqzSo79v2Hm49FV0ceNv6UJpr0aF EGVl2YS/XQCKVgNEyWW01x1TWCSPbuR+S/E/foXCErFJTKj8DMQtJe8T1e9hKym6xVac 6jYBW8c6+ZiUrt06uzoFOOtx8NMuDIzONxnKirx08QfGQ+bPlJmfo2exMnmGVD3/iqg9 1k2HEHvU8ePtv5Hf/pvHI99jnXTAIfevC5e6khDqgoZP1w/7RCa4GEhAKOPB6jg30sRU sBQw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.156.105 with SMTP id wd9mr4653lbb.68.1398801295443; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.234.229 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:54:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwh0Sc2wtvjEAjOMi4emDzyF4JWmmzYr5QEFcmyoKtkTAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Enough DMARC whinging
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NJ-w04RJ9575Nr6IDjj0kCkuU7k
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:54:59 -0000
I am finding it rather hard to follow the DMARC discussion. Some folk have managed to convince me that they are upset but working out why would require rather a lot of spec crunching. My best theory so far is that DMARC is some sort of email policy statement and that either (1) some companies are now publishing a policy that states 'reject all mail that purports to come from this address that does not have authentication Y' or (2) some companies are now rejecting mail not in compliance with said policy or (3) both. There is a simple truth about DNS names: Whoever owns them makes the rules for their use [1]. If you don't like the rules for google.com then choose another domain to post from. If people want email to work with mailing lists, then don't complain about reasonable choices people want to make. Work out a way to fix mailing lists so that they work properly. There is no reason we can't change the way From works. Or add new from headers. Are we engineers or curators of the past? [1] Thus be rather suspicious of folk who claim that we merely rent the use on terms of their choosing. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
- Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Mitch Rodrigues
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging John C Klensin
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging John Levine
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Jim Fenton
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Hector Santos
- Commenting on/ reviewing Independent Submissions … John C Klensin
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Mark Andrews
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Hector Santos
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Doug Barton
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging t.p.
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Not Enough DMARC whinging John Levine
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Jim Fenton
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Miles Fidelman
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Cridland
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Crocker
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Dave Cridland
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Enough DMARC whinging Murray S. Kucherawy
- Large market player S Moonesamy
- Re: Large market player Abdussalam Baryun