Re: Spam in the IETF's name?

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Mon, 24 October 2005 07:59 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ETxEs-0004tG-GX; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:59:26 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ETxEp-0004tA-Uo for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:59:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA23365 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:59:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.152]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ETxRW-00016w-Rh for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 04:12:32 -0400
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate3.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9O7xB7V083544 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:59:11 GMT
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j9O7xBcf235758 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:59:11 +0200
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9O7xBcQ004348 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:59:11 +0200
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9O7xAEr004335; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:59:10 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-249-134.de.ibm.com [9.145.249.134]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA54908; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:59:09 +0200
Message-ID: <435C944C.7090307@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:59:08 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <ECB22632E1E1FAD19E47FFAB@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <43576C59.1090802@zurich.ibm.com> <1115CFE58B1D40A44FA946E8@scan.jck.com> <4357B321.6010906@zurich.ibm.com> <8C1D3011ABF32F7AEB3D8477@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no> <62E9EA464959C69379D2CC82@scan.jck.com> <4358F844.7030503@zurich.ibm.com> <D6CFF566DCC513AD9440FE12@scan.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <D6CFF566DCC513AD9440FE12@scan.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Spam in the IETF's name?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> --On Friday, 21 October, 2005 16:16 +0200 Brian E Carpenter
> <brc@zurich.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>As a hopefully constructive suggestion, perhaps people
>>can look at draft-hoffman-taobis-03.txt and see whether
>>it says enough in this whole area. Covering this in the
>>Tao seems right to me.
> 
> 
> Brian, it seems at least reasonable to me too.  But there is a
> missing link, for which general agreement (at least within the
> IESG) is needed, but for which no formal action is required:
> 
> The Tao is not exactly required reading.   Many of our
> participants don't know about it.   Many of those, especially
> from other organizations, who might be putting together
> IETF-related, but not IETF-associated, mailing lists and the
> like may be even less likely to know about it.  If, when someone
> comes to an AD and says "please put this mailing list on your
> list", the AD responds with "have you read XXX and do you
> understand that, if we list your list, we are going to expect
> that you will conform to the principles of Sections A, B, and
> C?", it would make the connection and be really helpful.
> 
> That brings us back, I think, to where we started.  At present,
> listing of an activity or mailing list on that web page creates
> the expectation of conformance with our IPR policies.  That
> expectation is reasonable and necessary but not, IMO,
> sufficient.  We should also have the expectation of conformance
> with some reasonable community norms of behavior in addition to
> the IPR ones.  To the extent to which the Tao is our best
> description of those norms, pointing to it is entirely
> appropriate.  But, just as with the IPR case, we must not only
> have the relevant documents, but someone or something must do
> the pointing.

I agree. I always point newcomers to the Tao, and I believe we
should all do so. The "overview" page on the web site does so
too.

    Brian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf