Re: Spam in the IETF's name?
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Thu, 20 October 2005 15:16 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESc9y-0003Gn-3r; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:16:50 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESc9w-0003Gh-6j for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:16:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22686 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:16:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EScLs-0005PW-R8 for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:29:10 -0400
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE34C2596C4; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09481-09; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:15:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.160] (163.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.163]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BE42596C3; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:15:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:17:15 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Message-ID: <8C1D3011ABF32F7AEB3D8477@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <4357B321.6010906@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <ECB22632E1E1FAD19E47FFAB@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <43576C59.1090802@zurich.ibm.com> <1115CFE58B1D40A44FA946E8@scan.jck.com> <4357B321.6010906@zurich.ibm.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Spam in the IETF's name?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
--On torsdag, oktober 20, 2005 17:09:21 +0200 Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> wrote: > We do, however, pay quite close attention to ensuring that meetings > that *haven't* been sanctioned by an AD don't use the IETF's name > inappropriately. But statements such as "we are meeting in the same > hotel as the IETF" are factual, and we can't complain at factual > statements. In the case of this particular person, he was using "we" quite a lot, and without mentioning any organization but the IETF. I think anyone who wasn't an "IETF insider" would assume that the writer spoke on behalf of the IETF - but I know enough of what the IETF is doing to see that this set of ideas have absolutely no IETF consensus behind it at the moment, so I knew this couldn't be right. That's what got me upset over that aspect; if it had started out "I and a few other friends have this great idea that we're pushing in the IETF, and we want to meet to talk about it", I'd only have been upset about the method, not the content. (I find the idea space fascinating, however. I've joined the mailing list, but only 2 messages on it so far, and none with any content.) Harald _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Spam in the IETF's name? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? John C Klensin
- RE: Spam in the IETF's name? Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: Spam in the IETF's name? John C Klensin
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Frank Ellermann
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? John C Klensin
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Jeroen Massar
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? John C Klensin
- When to announce a new mailing list on ietf-annou… Dave Crocker
- Re: When to announce a new mailing list on ietf-a… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Spam in the IETF's name? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: When to announce a new mailing list on ietf-a… Dave Crocker
- Re: When to announce a new mailing list on ietf-a… John C Klensin