RE: Bake-off as trademark
"Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@marconi.com> Mon, 06 November 2000 23:30 UTC
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id SAA19050 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 18:30:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.68.6]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id RAA24244 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:24:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02101; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:23:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from whq-msgrtr-01.fore.com (whq-msgrtr-01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21375; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:23:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: by whq-msgrtr-01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <V6TAD940>; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:23:02 -0500
Message-ID: <4FBEA8857476D311A03300204840E1CF01A6E9D3@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com>
From: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@marconi.com>
To: "'Henning G. Schulzrinne'" <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Bake-off as trademark
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 17:23:42 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
I also looked at the references in RFC1025, and found that IEN-70 and IEN-77 are not on line. However, IEN-165 is: http://www.normos.org/ietf/ien/ien-160.txt.1 J. Postel IEN 160 ISI 7 November 1980 Internet Meeting Notes -- 7-8-9 October 1980 and states: BAKE OFF SUMMARY Dave Mills reported on the sessions for testing the fragmentation ... Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: Henning G. Schulzrinne [mailto:hgs@cs.columbia.edu] > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 3:15 PM > To: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Bake-off as trademark > > > I've been approached regarding the use of the (claimed-to-be) > trademarked term bake-off. It would be helpful if somebody can provide > credible evidence that this term has been used within the technical > community for many years. (In case you didn't know, > http://www.bakeoff.com/ shows the non-technical use....) > > Thank you. > -- > Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs > > - > This message was passed through ietf+censored@alvestrand.no, which > is a sublist of ietf@ietf.org. Not all messages are passed. > Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Harald Alvestrand. >
- Re: Bake-off as trademark John Stracke
- Bake-off as trademark Henning G. Schulzrinne
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Tim Salo
- Re: Bake-off as trademark James Aldridge
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Bob Braden
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Randy Bush
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Mike_Borella
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Herman Silbiger
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Ole J. Jacobsen
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Jeff Weisberg
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Bill Manning
- RE: Bake-off as trademark Rosen, Brian
- RE: Bake-off as trademark Rosen, Brian
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Scott Brim
- RE: Bake-off as trademark Bernie Volz
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Henning G. Schulzrinne
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Masataka Ohta
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Jim_Stephenson-Dunn
- RE: Bake-off as trademark Michael Francois
- Re: Bake-off as trademark hardie
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Keith Moore
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Marcus Leech
- Re: Bake-off as trademark John Stracke
- Re: Bake-off as trademark Paul Hoffman / IMC