Re: Bake-off as trademark

Scott Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Mon, 06 November 2000 23:40 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id SAA22371 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 18:40:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.163.11]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id RAA29698 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:39:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from airborne.cisco.com (airborne.cisco.com [171.71.154.32]) by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA19314; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:38:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbrim-nt.cisco.com (dhcp-128-107-141-187.cisco.com [128.107.141.187]) by airborne.cisco.com (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AAI16306; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:38:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001106173723.00ae05b0@airborne.cisco.com>
X-Sender: sbrim@airborne.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 17:38:20 -0500
To: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
From: Scott Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Bake-off as trademark
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, hgs@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU
In-Reply-To: <200011062122.VAA26405@gra.isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org

At 09:22 PM 11/06/2000 +0000, Bob Braden wrote:
>Henning,
>
>Please see RFC 1025 from Sept 1987, or IEN 160 (online at
>the RFC Editor web site) for a November 1980 bake off.
>Is this 20 years ago early enough?

Since the first Pillsbury Bake-Off was 50 years ago, no.  But what's the 
issue?  Is Pillsbury telling us cease and desist?