Re: Bake-off as trademark

hardie@equinix.com Tue, 07 November 2000 02:30 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id VAA22871 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:30:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nemo.corp.equinix.com (somehost-2.equinix.net [207.20.85.154]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id VAA20678 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:24:38 -0500 (EST)
From: hardie@equinix.com
Received: (from hardie@localhost) by nemo.corp.equinix.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA15811; Mon, 6 Nov 2000 18:24:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200011070224.SAA15811@nemo.corp.equinix.com>
Subject: Re: Bake-off as trademark
To: smb@research.att.com
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:24:35 -0800
Cc: hgs@cs.columbia.edu, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20001106205905.A206135DC2@smb.research.att.com> from "Steven M. Bellovin" at Nov 06, 2000 03:59:05 PM
Reply-to: hardie@equinix.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>    The IAB/IETF are committed to a timely introduction of OSI into the
>    Internet.

I seem to recall Jake Feinler (who fought had against the mandate of
OSI by the government in GOSIP) said that the appropriate timing of
the introduction of OSI protocols would be measured by ice crystal
formation in Hell.  "Never" is time too, after all.

See RFC1169 for more about GOSIP.  We're your government, and we're
here to help you.

			Ted Hardie
			(No longer part of anyone's government)