Re: Qualifying for NomCom

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DE112D55A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qsRnQtug1t7z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x236.google.com (mail-pf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ADB012D10C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 184so62703505pff.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a2bmTh2/Wgf2g4VC33BGsqvvJp/TZgWFBgiqOqxlr8U=; b=DtO+x2D1TXxUpAC7d2rR1uZIcfplc7dYcohp3zH37nYoaSd4GI19P1TIfMzQoLNTFu +4X3WihWVLQgRHtMIDPNrzjrfnvnsysNQHjaFRl/rNBUsJO0QZjwViXARi3/7PEJncL9 SMExejbB6owekC/oE1dqOHAWJtG1Jba3EGMvYgDTcJEfgwKxLw8vuDCLTXQFBG4sZRlI rsnKq69R3JhHH57NSKDSG27vxAa8/tiryqMDBffR9PXMApcbtAJ8OaruoWhZ4mQZT8BT hOY/9Pnz/y0kX3/8WOfvYhCgV/0JcfvAu/xV06hSb8PrcpgideZ2Wi/exAktFvWIa1YS T31A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a2bmTh2/Wgf2g4VC33BGsqvvJp/TZgWFBgiqOqxlr8U=; b=Lawli6U+Tytw/kAKHqjxdMbxG/LrQPeyGNt9YrC6OgKCF9Le+T0S6wltxJWMtFq8Th D7GyUq+nv4+NTovTAvKKcZXkzsnrG4h+GcGRq/ESMf6VV+Qq3uM2qG9rjuhJNOFV/mWS fGi4PHLmUpHY+eVaNhP3gksYsVAcN96NEYeBXerWXAjBs6ESi3lsqC83cdIkHV9QWfU3 1V+swAyVPot0AEnVibcFn5Qkg8D15jpf6nCRlsyuDp4/PUKlptM3X5VuGY2F4xWXfxRq nL6d+5R3uoQsi0uvD4lnkXMS7yMhUIN9jMM5iw+07GTR1r1tBUO7Osjxdpn54Vgr4oED km5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKVj+BsCrlaUS4f/Tr85BjzaHdkkFxGb2OnI/Se1L/XbKk+2wDHdWsLJhC9rRAzDg==
X-Received: by 10.98.18.195 with SMTP id 64mr7464833pfs.131.1460063377754; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:78d0:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:78d0:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l11sm14166746pfb.56.2016.04.07.14.09.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAL0qLwY0FuDp5=RMFEhUMtkK=XNDxX2dogvVY7+OSy88jrrvOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=SYpo-CiHoc07Ukb04Kb1LGV2=BPPyRLUsaqyLM9Hbwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbhYRqw7fXHzYY0=W-CpmeHeDdaZx3z2Qg0cA2aMrmVwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nqmC7NJyg2M6Na8vUj8T-qObO-1gHFEXZzrobb3oOQhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZHGa5OvSmZ=bTd6AWchsm4r=QaJn2nPqD+YjeWPmH9pA@mail.gmail.com> <24691.1460062367@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <5706CC94.3080804@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:09:40 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <24691.1460062367@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/CYx6Wh-zae8XxCZB8ky7zYx2NF8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 21:09:40 -0000

On 08/04/2016 08:52, Michael Richardson wrote:
...
>     > On the other hand, I realize now that previous thread went on longer
>     > than I remembered, and there was a proposal that we (I, probably)
>     > construct an RFC3933-style process experiment and let that run for a
>     > while. If it works well, we can codify it by adding it to RFC7437bis.
>     > So I'll do that. If anyone wants to volunteer to collaborate on it,
>     > please contact me directly.
> 
> Yes, let's do that!
> 
> It would awesome if we could say definitely that the new rules
> contribute to more volunteers before we actually use them.

That's not quite how RFC3933 works. You'd *actually* run the experimental
procedure for (say) one cycle, with automatic reversion to RFC7437 unless
RFC7437bis was approved. I think it's a good idea. A one-year experiment
affects ~half the IESG and IAB seats so is highly unlikely to lead to
disaster.

   Brian