Re: Qualifying for NomCom

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33ED512D71D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UL_4P_tEmNl7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DC8F12D65D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id e185so115894050vkb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=yb5Q6aEwGesqrwsDDZSJa3U+zwUNEKzJOCjrm+mGpbE=; b=qaINyWKN0Q4RizzgNe5nhYFjSoKctHzTHiS7uv/3+iGxWJ8QN3I/2Rt8Cari/v8Ehq GPZ/EvtndTS5PknLW/dt0o/xVFefyLDesSzuxBqAQ4c2TwchRJiwT99iNmLbDJFTHigr saQ4jL8EfnprGkBxdJ++z599lec0LVRTjqFEXdOMnxBeK2X/Sf4vCOHJW1rGqAr+qCMs 9poIXdMXW3zNGWYJV4y0d8VWTq3eCTGoBVEYcK5/4bs7VO7wjuvxam29FZFhhD2kCgJH IqZa11v306hHNgHnGJlzCtMZxtobQQlbMurmYRvC2qGZ3Ne680LiZjd87g1M+zK5Uorg vTEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=yb5Q6aEwGesqrwsDDZSJa3U+zwUNEKzJOCjrm+mGpbE=; b=VDuHCcmcTYmq18JVv1Y6nVhcGnm6CZqpZ6FCfqaFAZGEz4uOZDDYs0gnxPwDMkSfep uXJUsr/qRehZ7nlpYe/1vf4s3MyV99TOiTNrTY9SWQy0vNs3tiy9Zj3tOmww7TbeRDWk XkX+Wp1Z1bx31MJ0mKgZyMcojitzG6eYFLkfgJVaKNZwZgMiMrZJxqVyuFg/GRo+V984 f33lPhjE3WVuGIb+r0h9ZK4yBt5zYPDqcF+y0n3OVi1z7MM98zL878tyqxTMK9UhUJsm wMLEaLCNWMBculRBKROH89IwYswngw2YpP9eFFY4JkIUpDqJd0gvurrEA3CrTUbzAhz2 8smg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ9TD6vwTSQ0rzujtYe7fXA7qgl6tTsAsegP3uOPeQizCox0Ksb/odZ4t4b9hfE2Qvp9hCittgtg3J/rw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.176.1.54 with SMTP id 51mr2428590uak.123.1460064067715; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.43.5 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5706CC94.3080804@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY0FuDp5=RMFEhUMtkK=XNDxX2dogvVY7+OSy88jrrvOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=SYpo-CiHoc07Ukb04Kb1LGV2=BPPyRLUsaqyLM9Hbwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbhYRqw7fXHzYY0=W-CpmeHeDdaZx3z2Qg0cA2aMrmVwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nqmC7NJyg2M6Na8vUj8T-qObO-1gHFEXZzrobb3oOQhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZHGa5OvSmZ=bTd6AWchsm4r=QaJn2nPqD+YjeWPmH9pA@mail.gmail.com> <24691.1460062367@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5706CC94.3080804@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:21:07 -0300
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYvCpL9wwHL0E33HRbMvcckpad=gV-VYgAomJpCdiSrpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113c86a81b07b1052feba847
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/eADtbZTdHsrKR4sBhEc6sfM1UZ8>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 21:21:13 -0000

How's this look for starters?

http://blackops.org/~msk/draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp.txt

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 08/04/2016 08:52, Michael Richardson wrote:
> ...
> >     > On the other hand, I realize now that previous thread went on
> longer
> >     > than I remembered, and there was a proposal that we (I, probably)
> >     > construct an RFC3933-style process experiment and let that run for
> a
> >     > while. If it works well, we can codify it by adding it to
> RFC7437bis.
> >     > So I'll do that. If anyone wants to volunteer to collaborate on it,
> >     > please contact me directly.
> >
> > Yes, let's do that!
> >
> > It would awesome if we could say definitely that the new rules
> > contribute to more volunteers before we actually use them.
>
> That's not quite how RFC3933 works. You'd *actually* run the experimental
> procedure for (say) one cycle, with automatic reversion to RFC7437 unless
> RFC7437bis was approved. I think it's a good idea. A one-year experiment
> affects ~half the IESG and IAB seats so is highly unlikely to lead to
> disaster.
>
>    Brian
>
>