IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Telnet and FTP to Historic

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Thu, 03 December 2020 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A003A08AB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 23:22:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rYoA7BGKUox for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 23:22:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6553E3A08AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 23:22:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CnFNd24LszVyvrT+huD34BViaTxSnY0cH+Z9aQUeuIw=; b=zXBKqd0yrYCV4GkUlWh5xNh2kD EB9imftHJ8YfoX0lYuovyAbtoHlkjk0mZWsxSmryEp74OyWd6AKfeFJAgnFiqPnhqIyYTOUwRwLdS DkKnAeGiId9QN/pGnmisJLeH9wkmOUMGbeZP3BDfrhrCh3LYZSGzItWHyPaqtkZXjkQl25oEPQQGW BysgcxA5k0QYm0Iqa6lKiLZEbHVwQXnGKLdpVqW+j3m7vDbGMOoexSRarAJknXglNon2WSAYIfrBQ SzfOm2odDcHtqinfnf8yZZeVSNry8IZKUs0R7sMmTnmfJOBA2ajhvp78wbEsXbMZ05tt7T4XKVnoI JMoQnEyQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:58654 helo=[192.168.1.13]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1kkiwL-003Ryy-IY; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 02:22:13 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Telnet and FTP to Historic
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <c9483300-b1b9-0244-542e-1071457da567@huitema.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 23:22:08 -0800
Cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "John C. Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <4DC0C34E-FF78-4341-94E3-684B7EF16CB3@strayalpha.com>
References: <c9483300-b1b9-0244-542e-1071457da567@huitema.net>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18B92)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/FQg_ibVm6xgO96jM3LFI5nHBhG4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 07:22:18 -0000


> On Dec 2, 2020, at 10:47 PM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
> 
> Mark, you had me until "home network". Because most home networks are in fact *not* more secure than the open Internet

Not that I like NATs, but they do afford protection beyond being on the open Internet simply by lacking incoming port mapping.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email