Re: Fully functional email address

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Rob,
At 03:33 PM 16-06-2025, Rob Sayre wrote:
>We should. But the main problem in this case is not the email 
>address, but that the complaint was submitted as a self-hosted PDF. 
>It's not clear that the PDF document is subject to the Note Well. 
>The response invited the person to make a submission in email where 
>that would be more clear.

Whether a self-hosted PDF is a valid complaint depends on how RFC 
5378, Section 1(a) is interpreted.  There is an answer about "fair 
use" in the IETF Trust's frequently asked questions.  It may be a bit 
complicated for some participants; the IETF Trust said that it varies 
from country to country.

>We do tolerate those automatically inserted corporate email footers 
>that contradict the Note Well, because you can't just make up your 
>own rules as you send an email. In this case, the email could start 
>with "This is a verbatim copy of <URL>...".

Those corporate footers are discussed in the "Note Well" (RFC 5378, 
Section 5.2).

Regards,
S. Moonesamy