IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fully functional email address

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 17 June 2025 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016D636123F9; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-nQPMWtOazV; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3101536123D1; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.117.114.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 55HHHV9Y009550 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1750180666; x=1750267066; i=@elandsys.com; bh=U5HHKVmr8RF209XQzwOob3ykppESfhqvpAQip1AC8gI=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=tvOjynuRmriuSIF/vPB6cYyfY/I25Qq8u2uk+7sau5Y8Gn0LY0nmNf7M0kZ+M8ndK iEugs1pjCCs3yi8ue2Y3X+cd1EB3yltDAkMhXmBZbwMETutC0vIgbEAmhLW69upQVH dOkenzFNoh6hIDaIKBuw8CPZpPpqCU8AE9sffA7w=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20250617093328.0f4876e0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 10:16:50 -0700
To: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Fully functional email address
In-Reply-To: <C69C4FD4-1681-4C74-9CD6-36013758095E@ietf.org>
References: <CAChr6SyjvEBU=O0uiyfzYKNoBCW26KmSp2GriPtxMJEBSfxLbw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20250616181644.19ba6ab0@elandnews.com> <C69C4FD4-1681-4C74-9CD6-36013758095E@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: SLBXNZHAEBZ45NGLQOF7RWNYME7CIMRG
X-Message-ID-Hash: SLBXNZHAEBZ45NGLQOF7RWNYME7CIMRG
X-MailFrom: sm@elandsys.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/TuiH4BbR2JyVRr8Qw4dGmdylUG4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Jay,
At 07:11 AM 17-06-2025, Jay Daley wrote:
>There have been a number of self-hosted PDFs submitted as appeals so 
>it is not clear which one is being referred to.  For one of these, 
>where its use as a contribution was challenged, there is no lack of 
>clarity or question of interpretation, as per my official response:
>
>   https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/5C1_WjpQNeHKQf7ia15mxL2mVuk/

There was an URL in the message at 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1NH8OKABl0pzL8puVK3r5v1xkKU/ 
The discussion about self-hosted PDFs is on another thread (if a 
reader follows the mail archive threading).

 From what I understand of the "Note Well, and I could be wrong, it 
is up to the participant to read the relevant policies and figure out 
what to do.  People can have different interpretations of what they 
read; there would not be any disagreements or disputes if everyone agreed.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.34.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status