Re: How IETF treats contributors

Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de> Tue, 31 August 2004 20:31 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA29384; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:31:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2FJf-0007OM-KP; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:33:19 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2F89-00010o-HE; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:21:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C2EUE-0002Ws-0G for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:40:10 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA20653 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:40:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sklave3.rackland.de ([213.133.101.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2EWF-0004hv-6H for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:42:16 -0400
Received: from andromeda (uucp@localhost) by sklave3.rackland.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-1) with BSMTP id i7VJe73o018597; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:40:07 +0200
Received: (from hadmut@localhost) by andromeda.dresden.danisch.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) id i7VJcZIh024968; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:38:35 +0200
From: Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:38:35 +0200
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <20040831193835.GC22942@danisch.de>
References: <20040830090627.GA22982@danisch.de> <p06110403bd5906118d89@[129.46.227.161]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06110403bd5906118d89@[129.46.227.161]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: How IETF treats contributors
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17

On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 09:51:54AM -0700, Ted Hardie wrote:
>
> It was cited as an input draft to the MARID working group,
> and it was recommended for publication as an Experimental RFC with
> the other input drafts that came out of the ASRG process.


Thanks for that information. I didn't know that. 

The former ASRG co-chair who asked me to submit RMX as an 
exp RFC is not co-chair anymore. I asked the MARID chairs 
whether they know about the current state of the submission. 
I understood the answer in the way that RMX will not be 
published as an RFC anymore. 



> In other words,
> the IETF took you up on your offer to consider the draft seriously and
> to use it as input into the evolving standard in this area.

I highly appreciate that. Thanks.

It is just that I didn't know that and that this doesn't match the 
MARID chairs statements.



regards
Hadmut

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf