Re: How IETF treats contributors

Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com> Mon, 30 August 2004 21:37 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA05532; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:37:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1tsW-0000VL-AW; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:39:52 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C1tYv-0004ND-K5; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:19:37 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C1tQP-0000pD-1C for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:10:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA02399 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:10:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.59]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1tSF-0007yY-3e for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:12:43 -0400
Received: from crowley.qualcomm.com (crowley.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.151]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.12.10/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id i7UL9e57026534; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [129.46.227.161] (carbuncle.qualcomm.com [129.46.227.161]) by crowley.qualcomm.com (8.12.10/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id i7UL9bWk018062; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: hardie@mage.qualcomm.com
Message-Id: <p0611040bbd59466aa292@[129.46.227.161]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408301644050.28223-100000@cirrus.av8.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408301644050.28223-100000@cirrus.av8.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:09:36 -0700
To: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>
Subject: Re: How IETF treats contributors
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f4c2cf0bccc868e4cc88dace71fb3f44

At 4:55 PM -0400 8/30/04, Dean Anderson wrote:
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-marid-core-03.txt
>
>http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2002/msg00658.html
>
>The idea came from David Green, and Vixie says it originated from Jim
>Miller in 1998.  Vixie had little or nothing to do with it. Why the draft
>claims the earliest known work is due to Vixie is unclear.
>
>		--Dean

Elided below is the actual draft, "Repudiating Mail From".  The citation
is to the earliest known work (in other words, the earliest place someone
wrote down a solution based on this idea).  If you would like to suggest
to the authors of marid-core that Jim Miller ought to be cited as the source
of the idea from which Vixie's work was derived, I'm sure they will 
consider it.
Paul Vixie should still be cited, of course, as many people worked off of
his formulation of the idea; so should Hadmut Danisch, for the same reason.

The main point to be made, though, is that these are all contributions to
the IETF's collective work on the problem, and should be seen as such.
				regards,
					Ted Hardie





>==========================================================================
>     * To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
>     * Subject: Re: Mail-Transmitter RR
>     * From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
>     * Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 18:16:37 -0700
>     * In-reply-to: Message from David Green <green@couchpotato.net> of
>"Sat, 01 Jun 2002 20:49:48
>EDT."<Pine.LNX.4.44.0206012045470.8349-200000@david.couchpotato.net>
>
>
>>  I'm sorry if this is off-topic, but I couldn't find a working group that
>>  is working on dealing with spam, so this is the closest match I could
>>  find. I know this is in no way related to IPv6 or anything else you guys
>>  are working on, but it is an idea I had involving the addition of a RR
>>  type. If this is not the right place to be sending this, any pointers to
>>  other working groups/forums would be greatly appreciated. And I appreciate
>>  all of the hard work you guys are doing... My idea is attached (domauth.txt)
>
>In 1998, Jim Miller suggested this.  A few weeks ago, I wrote the
>following.  Comments are welcome.
>
>==========================================================================


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf