IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry

Dean Bogdanovic <deanb@juniper.net> Mon, 01 December 2014 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <deanb@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DE01A0163 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:33:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ADHoxKVKA6UY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:33:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0123.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A721A0A85 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 20:33:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BN1PR05MB424.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.58.148) by BN1PR05MB422.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.58.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.26.15; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 04:33:04 +0000
Received: from BN1PR05MB424.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.145]) by BN1PR05MB424.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.84]) with mapi id 15.01.0026.003; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 04:33:04 +0000
From: Dean Bogdanovic <deanb@juniper.net>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
Thread-Index: AQHQCjpTcdFHWvvEy0mHnKnSCcZk/5x6K1QA
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 04:33:04 +0000
Message-ID: <5B0D568E-9F17-49A9-8E0C-7F202E02464D@juniper.net>
References: <54770BA5.5060603@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <54770BA5.5060603@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR05MB422;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR05MB422;
x-forefront-prvs: 0412A98A59
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(377454003)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(50226001)(122556002)(107046002)(120916001)(19617315012)(4396001)(57306001)(31966008)(19580405001)(19580395003)(99396003)(36756003)(77096004)(97736003)(82746002)(15975445006)(21056001)(110136001)(77156002)(62966003)(93916002)(86362001)(64706001)(76176999)(50986999)(15202345003)(66066001)(19625215002)(101416001)(92566001)(92726001)(106116001)(40100003)(106356001)(105586002)(16236675004)(46102003)(83716003)(33656002)(89996001)(104166001)(87286001)(88136002)(95666004)(99286002)(87936001)(2656002)(20776003)(104396001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB422; H:BN1PR05MB424.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5B0D568E9F1749A98E0C7F202E02464Djunipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/KjgX58DM8pSnnNW3LDGRtqgN02I
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 04:33:09 -0000

Benoit,

You describe the situation really well, but as next step we have to get more organized and more coordination in modeling work. We have to make sure that there is not too much overlap between efforts, not too waste resources and as well create an architecture description document, where the relationship between models will be described. With that we can see which models can be reused as base model in other models.
Good example of coordination is the rtg-coord-yang mailing list, but we need one for all IETF, to be able to find what are other the teams working on.

We should not let this momentum go away and with few simple steps (like improving coordination and system meta architecture), continue to feed positive energy into this situation.

Dean
On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:31 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com<mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:

Dear all,

[netmod WG list is bcc'ed]

Enjoy http://www.ietf.org/blog/2014/11/yang-really-takes-off-in-the-industry/

Regards, Benoit


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email