IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 02 December 2014 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26AE1AC3A5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:10:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKep7nss8FVm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:10:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FED01A1BC0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Xvb3B-0003sG-BU; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:10:41 +0000
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 09:10:39 +0900
Message-ID: <m2sigyhpxc.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Subject: Re: Blog: YANG Really Takes Off in the Industry
In-Reply-To: <7890AE32-F7A9-4C32-9C3D-8251E70B1F29@lucidvision.com>
References: <54770BA5.5060603@cisco.com> <809EFD2B-A845-46B7-A394-A9C9E5393CD5@piuha.net> <547874D6.1090001@cisco.com> <7890AE32-F7A9-4C32-9C3D-8251E70B1F29@lucidvision.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/pjDbxNILtFwgIof3qIjUxHpzl4I
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:10:52 -0000

> the “MIB Doctor” model we are using is not going to scale out to the
> numbers of Yang models that are in need of advice or review, nor will
> be scale in terms of progressing models through the IETF’s RFC
> process.  The fact is that we simply do not have enough Yang Doctors
> to cover all of the models in question, despite our best efforts.

is this a sign that we do not have enough medical care or that we are
unleashing an unarchitected epidemic of overly device-specific snmp with
the syntax changed?

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email