Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com> Fri, 20 July 2012 19:03 UTC
Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FD221F853B; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WEV83yvoB-pt; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BF321F853C; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; l=1356; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1342811031; x=1344020631; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=fo0C0N8/c4MkCSEnqO3UXMuU8sldobiQYqkUBNXUkCA=; b=OgeUatKdJRm2SlCgzUniHUkxt0BdNgsuVw0gbGx0dh+f21uBQtdVEyXZ xO2SGWoREynRq5RfV2iH04hPlyA0LFaaBJ23ssSqaPjhRQq1OXAqJ+CJk wwywRA6uCHuhTGMtNDyD4KU6eiWjctvTQOJpNBjkQ62xnjec9nJDAFlbY E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,625,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="52536637"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2012 19:03:51 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-WS.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8714.cisco.com [10.99.80.21]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6KJ3ooZ028685; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:03:51 GMT
Message-Id: <201207201903.q6KJ3ooZ028685@mtv-core-1.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:03:47 -0500
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org>
From: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
In-Reply-To: <D7593A6A-41F7-4004-9249-FBBA5030D1C4@cisco.com>
References: <20120720160624.12163.25321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50098901.7090009@bogus.com> <D7593A6A-41F7-4004-9249-FBBA5030D1C4@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: "iaoc@ietf.org" <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:03:02 -0000
At 12:29 PM 7/20/2012, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: >On Jul 20, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote: > > > On 7/20/12 09:06 , IETF Administrative Director wrote: > >> The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed date change > for IETF 95 > >> scheduled for March 2016. > >> > >> Currently IETF 95 is scheduled for 27 March to 1 April 2016. 27 > March is Easter. > >> > >> The IAOC is proposing IETF 95 be rescheduled for 20 - 25 March > 2016 and would like > >> feedback on those dates before making a decision. Comments > appreciated to ietf@ietf.org > >> by 6 August 2012. > > > > 20 march is palm sunday on the western calender. > > > > If one's a conflict presumably the other is too... > >I personally avoid being away from home on Easter, and would prefer >that the IETF meeting avoid it. > >Yes, Palm Sunday is a question, but not quite on the same scale as >Easter. I will note, however, that Good Friday (the Friday before >Easter) is a national holiday in a number of countries. People >schedule vacations around that weekend. > >My suggestion: take the week of April 3 or later. I agree Easter is a date to avoid, but am not offering which way to move the meeting. April 3rd of later seems interesting, but does start to impact the interval between this meeting and the summer one. James
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change John Border
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Proposed IETF 95 Date Change IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Joel jaeggli
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Lixia Zhang
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change kathleen.moriarty
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change James Polk
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change James Polk
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Mary Barnes
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Joel jaeggli
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Paul Hoffman
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Randy Bush
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Yoav Nir
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Muhammad Badi
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Martin Thomson
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Noel Chiappa
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Ofer Inbar
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change John Levine
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Yaakov Stein
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Yoav Nir
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change John Levine
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Paul Hoffman
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change John Levine
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Luigi Iannone
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Carsten Bormann
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Pelletier Ray
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change James Polk
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Samuel Weiler
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Martin Rex
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Daryl Malas
- Proposed IETF 95 Date Change IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change t.p.
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Kuor-Hsin.Chang
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Philip Matthews
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Perala, Timo (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Ronald Bonica