Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com> Fri, 20 July 2012 19:00 UTC
Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEE921F851B; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.513
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YueBR2CbSyNJ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7027A21F8637; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 12:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; l=1644; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1342810881; x=1344020481; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=mqA8am6TJTWCVLVeY6WZcLrqerjIl2I6dWsjMqb1LzU=; b=Y6fK6KDVxQeBfEKj1LXybEwJWoKYSZYgnEveXQM0L0X2kw3QjGRR6jL5 BCRYsIz5mNvsU3WJ5pCJsVEWqapf91do1TTstdIW86+VwUEG59r4789Wp 2IbASrEQK39MXaEJRfn3N4MQhILjLRHhKiubxG67CPC1gRd3dIRgqtAQY c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAPSpCVCrRDoI/2dsb2JhbABFuU6BB4IgAQEBBBIBJQI/EAcEGB4QGT4GARIUDodqDJ5aoCiLToZgA4hNmxyBZoJ9
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,625,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="49963128"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2012 19:01:15 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-WS.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8714.cisco.com [10.99.80.21]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6KJ1Eaj030858; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:01:14 GMT
Message-Id: <201207201901.q6KJ1Eaj030858@mtv-core-3.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:01:10 -0500
To: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
From: James Polk <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
In-Reply-To: <31E58CB3-05F6-4E74-ABD3-C87BB2662897@bbn.com>
References: <20120720160624.12163.25321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50098901.7090009@bogus.com> <D7593A6A-41F7-4004-9249-FBBA5030D1C4@cisco.com> <CAA=duU0XK=gJJzS-7gDGP_NQz=dPxvR4G_xRUnPHNoa537YrxQ@mail.gmail.com> <31E58CB3-05F6-4E74-ABD3-C87BB2662897@bbn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: "iaoc@ietf.org" <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:00:31 -0000
At 12:58 PM 7/20/2012, Richard L. Barnes wrote: >For convenience, the complete list: ><http://www.interfaithcalendar.org/2016.htm> outstanding - now we can't meet that whole year... ;-) >On Jul 20, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Andrew G. Malis wrote: > > > As long as you don't go any later than the week of April 10 - the week > > of April 17 runs into the start of Passover. > > > > Thanks, > > Andy > > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Jul 20, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote: > >> > >>> On 7/20/12 09:06 , IETF Administrative Director wrote: > >>>> The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed date > change for IETF 95 > >>>> scheduled for March 2016. > >>>> > >>>> Currently IETF 95 is scheduled for 27 March to 1 April > 2016. 27 March is Easter. > >>>> > >>>> The IAOC is proposing IETF 95 be rescheduled for 20 - 25 March > 2016 and would like > >>>> feedback on those dates before making a decision. Comments > appreciated to ietf@ietf.org > >>>> by 6 August 2012. > >>> > >>> 20 march is palm sunday on the western calender. > >>> > >>> If one's a conflict presumably the other is too... > >> > >> I personally avoid being away from home on Easter, and would > prefer that the IETF meeting avoid it. > >> > >> Yes, Palm Sunday is a question, but not quite on the same scale > as Easter. I will note, however, that Good Friday (the Friday > before Easter) is a national holiday in a number of countries. > People schedule vacations around that weekend. > >> > >> My suggestion: take the week of April 3 or later.
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change John Border
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Proposed IETF 95 Date Change IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Joel jaeggli
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Lixia Zhang
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change kathleen.moriarty
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change James Polk
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change James Polk
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Mary Barnes
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Joel jaeggli
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Paul Hoffman
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Eliot Lear
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Randy Bush
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Yoav Nir
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Muhammad Badi
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Martin Thomson
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Noel Chiappa
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Ofer Inbar
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change John Levine
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Yaakov Stein
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Yoav Nir
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change John Levine
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Paul Hoffman
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change John Levine
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Melinda Shore
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Luigi Iannone
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Carsten Bormann
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Pelletier Ray
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change James Polk
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Samuel Weiler
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Martin Rex
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Daryl Malas
- Proposed IETF 95 Date Change IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Olaf Kolkman
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change t.p.
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Kuor-Hsin.Chang
- Re: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Philip Matthews
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Perala, Timo (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Glen Zorn
- RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change Ronald Bonica