IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Fri, 03 August 2012 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C115B21E8034 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.192, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wnl+5VSwMnXc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5076D21F8D69 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 13:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so65576pbb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=UyZl825GXQadURXGnwO3+QcttchYRhuZjReaW9ml7DM=; b=NI0EKG146NYFvCupxsJLZrBuZoPsitq/L18wxisQuI0niyVQUdZ9VMdAS3nNB3+b0f JXF7b1ahJ86H+GI6LDTu5TfQ1xbWDq00EGr+GY7Ngf+tJcdyNkY7M5tA6wzx2s9PNHKn jj8hJpJqnsQpmmZkwIISwRhpqFoFi2fWlA2J0kgRz5q9/jIWpZ/c3CegNQpdwdGQOwei ORjWSN//1+LK7fT06pcGijzQrQUWh4f/8v5E9G78a6F7RWEiZUWK0CEJyaBHKe+bmCB/ Wvr0Hfc3CQMpnZmCIjGFZP11qZukoKSQPmsZvoJLaPgz5gpIQPKwBLM9w8wHk/29cq4/ tGJQ==
Received: by 10.68.232.103 with SMTP id tn7mr188652pbc.86.1344025035145; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.195] (216-19-185-109.dyn.novuscom.net. [216.19.185.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id pi7sm3525136pbb.56.2012.08.03.13.17.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: Proposed IETF 95 Date Change
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4AF3E8170315EC458F9110B8F9DEDAA801AF275C@FIESEXC016.nsn-intra.net>
References: <20120802164551.20569.2082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FEF37558-FA51-4D8E-A6E9-654716CC3484@magma.ca> <4AF3E8170315EC458F9110B8F9DEDAA801AF275C@FIESEXC016.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-Qm8xfucN5ZIAQp6SKSwL"
Organization: Network Zen
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:17:12 -0700
Message-ID: <1344025032.14865.6.camel@gwz-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:17:15 -0000


> I would personally prefer if the meeting was rescheduled for the week of
> April 3 - 8.


Strongly opposed.

...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email