IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Saturday as start day

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716CD129BC5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ruQ_Jipiw2Lt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22e.google.com (mail-ot0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E365129B9B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id r67so113488203ota.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4vQ5o0LQ0TQkrkQEB68ZApFcsmmQYGa/THGu+AUZ2uA=; b=CrpaDxEugVYuRgt2skmol2qnu3bDW/zTpb3xsfbTspNLsZEOfcrqJomycKUduTNpSs J3ZU+Dzmnr4i6RpfrTjnBr34ugVksaB+ccLLGXIldbyzwIpLEyVjbNkbZRCuTumxiq/N diw6Gog5iZKX57mP49aWBStsWnfkblpM8AwaAxQ6n88f6/sXX66eZyRiKtfoRzdnHBDu Biu1NZsrdprvV/p1RL0Pyf/3PLak/dBPO+1ojlRlHm+4o3hQfvgKrQHNzQUNcVhZFkB/ EWMjXkQpq4Z9XpJ4f0cFMiT8clV0i21vQ5gHJh5e8HYdJRRYh4Nt39jEpnUQa2/2LTD1 VlYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4vQ5o0LQ0TQkrkQEB68ZApFcsmmQYGa/THGu+AUZ2uA=; b=uNhV5VlZ4IeQ9KK4ET8kZ+JIadupHwhAsY/nSOnsDaLN/n46MqmI+jaKz78YyJZb0+ 9+tTM8iadQlwJF6XeVVcTz4uRFer3kuu0eeQoTrskH2jJzF4ZgnLVnTNI5DH5+wAK+EO d14/T6SgA3OZ8u/uLYwRubBWJZGqjOVqkBfWepTObWu1Dz4LW7ly7m1sDgkD/BHY51DE r5IhRfq7SWJQP6+fjj+qgwuocpIU0e92n6H2xBQDyUcwNgclQxPSqcSClq5Q0Lw4zIiy t4B7BHXZBG7vwM8yit14jKIoCRqX+6zhXI/58q+HDkv4RDESvM3sR3JUPw1WEmVHvxGT nHCg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOw6QDFIrqT1DCabFdKAcvVk6UT2qk7n4+NgvAfOkpGWTMdEiqPj TGZhy070i+2gA7AQGsZdfB/1POJ8pC1Y
X-Received: by 10.157.42.4 with SMTP id t4mr14669466ota.146.1498056000708; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.46.165 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a6ceaa2d-16fa-6145-bd2d-811dba6027ea@huitema.net>
References: <63406DFB-217A-4306-B717-E86D97BA2AA9@cooperw.in> <709494B2-53ED-4483-9B1C-3855D81CD120@gmail.com> <a6ceaa2d-16fa-6145-bd2d-811dba6027ea@huitema.net>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 10:39:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1tJDYm75Ons1sH-cFu8E0Nj+0H_J6oTc57BojhZdcSxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Saturday as start day
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113582acc6aaea0552795742"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LxipB_XGXzlNmeh12ewdymh4_6g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 14:40:26 -0000

Christian,

Alissa clearly said that there’s no change to the schedule, this is solely
to help attendees get visas and travel approval when they want to
participate in the hackathon and code sprint.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
wrote:

> On 6/21/2017 5:46 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>
> > Alissa,
> >
> >> On Jun 21, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Based on a suggestion from Paul Hoffman, the IESG believes it would be
> beneficial to denote the official start of IETF meetings to be on Saturday
> rather than Sunday, starting with IETF 100. We believe this would be
> sensible given that events such as the hackathon and code sprint start on
> Saturday, and may make it easier for some participants to get travel
> approval to attend those events. This change would be reflected in the
> dates posted on the IETF web site and sent out in email announcements. We
> are not proposing any changes in terms of the scheduling of any
> meeting-related events, the full availability of the meeting network
> starting on Sunday, the opening of on-site registration, or the meeting fee.
> >>
> > I think this is a fine idea, essentially formalizing what has happened
> informally.  I suspect once in effect it will push the network to be
> deployed earlier, but given current Saturday events, that was also probably
> going to happen at some point.
> Matching reality is always a fine idea. But there might be a problem
> with that reality...
> >> If you have feedback about this change, please send it to ietf@ietf.org,
> or exceptionally to iesg@ietf.org, by July 5, 2017.
> The problem is that we now are expected to have work going non stop from
> Saturday to Friday. 7 full days. Maybe I am just old, but that does not
> look healthy.
>
> -- Christian Huitema
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email