IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Saturday as start day

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Fri, 23 June 2017 05:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0BD126C0F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org header.d=gondrom.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQzCJFVYV_Lx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gondrom.org (www.gondrom.org [5.35.241.16]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A9B6120721 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 22:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Galaxy-S6 (unknown [112.97.59.18]) by gondrom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CF3E64334; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 07:39:19 +0200 (CEST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=N5MURKd+gIFT9Hx/wMngEkDxuN151g+3bJacusCG6d0WZcUEDYSv+G2iHCvQC6KM5ouHvNBB9iQzxApEgS67S2Wa0lRRZaq9NbtmY//Syf5k1E24mE3pfc3wh2LgxUiT3hZjBwIUWiugQlGcyCygmIlS/qezT4TdEOmrJGIsp60=; h=Date:User-Agent:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:To:CC:From:Message-ID;
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:39:13 +0800
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <709494B2-53ED-4483-9B1C-3855D81CD120@gmail.com>
References: <63406DFB-217A-4306-B717-E86D97BA2AA9@cooperw.in> <709494B2-53ED-4483-9B1C-3855D81CD120@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----Q93WEDGHCS9O6XLNZ44DSBWMT454VT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Saturday as start day
To: ietf@ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
CC: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
Message-ID: <25CD3E0C-A03D-49A3-8375-AD4D834BF94B@gondrom.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_aIzJGKfA4lKO6IvGhZQKT9aOis>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 05:39:26 -0000

I also agree. This is good idea.
(with my individual hat on... ;-) )
Best regards, Tobias

On June 21, 2017 8:46:57 PM GMT+08:00, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>Alissa,
>
>> On Jun 21, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Based on a suggestion from Paul Hoffman, the IESG believes it would
>be beneficial to denote the official start of IETF meetings to be on
>Saturday rather than Sunday, starting with IETF 100. We believe this
>would be sensible given that events such as the hackathon and code
>sprint start on Saturday, and may make it easier for some participants
>to get travel approval to attend those events. This change would be
>reflected in the dates posted on the IETF web site and sent out in
>email announcements. We are not proposing any changes in terms of the
>scheduling of any meeting-related events, the full availability of the
>meeting network starting on Sunday, the opening of on-site
>registration, or the meeting fee.
>> 
>
>I think this is a fine idea, essentially formalizing what has happened
>informally.  I suspect once in effect it will push the network to be
>deployed earlier, but given current Saturday events, that was also
>probably going to happen at some point.
>
>Thanks,
>Bob
>
>
>
>> If you have feedback about this change, please send it to
>ietf@ietf.org, or exceptionally to iesg@ietf.org, by July 5, 2017.
>> 

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email