Re: Saturday as start day
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 16:31 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0678512EBCD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TZ3WZnXfl6sB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C150129B1A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30799 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2017 16:30:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 21 Jun 2017 16:30:55 -0000
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:30:33 -0000
Message-ID: <20170621163033.22249.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: huitema@huitema.net
Subject: Re: Saturday as start day
In-Reply-To: <a6ceaa2d-16fa-6145-bd2d-811dba6027ea@huitema.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/rdHg38K7_sjL-mkDesCv6IMi2TY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:31:07 -0000
In article <a6ceaa2d-16fa-6145-bd2d-811dba6027ea@huitema.net> you write: >Matching reality is always a fine idea. But there might be a problem >with that reality... My only concern is that if the announcement says it starts Saturday, people will take that as permission to start scheduling stuff on the preceding Friday, "the day before". I'm thinking of weasel wording, e.g., pre-meeting activities on Saturday, meeting Sunday-Friday. R's, John PS: See any ICANN meeting calendar to see what I mean.
- Saturday as start day Alissa Cooper
- Re: Saturday as start day Bob Hinden
- Re: Saturday as start day Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Saturday as start day Christian Huitema
- Re: Saturday as start day Thomas Nadeau
- Re: Saturday as start day Tim Chown
- Re: Saturday as start day Livingood, Jason
- Re: Saturday as start day Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Saturday as start day John Levine
- Re: Saturday as start day Lee Howard
- Re: Saturday as start day Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Saturday as start day Jeff Tantsura
- Re: Saturday as start day Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: Saturday as start day Randy Bush
- Re: Saturday as start day George Michaelson
- Re: Saturday as start day Jari Arkko
- Re: Saturday as start day Tobias Gondrom
- Re: Saturday as start day Eric Burger
- Re: Saturday as start day tom p.
- Re: Saturday as start day Alissa Cooper