IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Saturday as start day

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 12 July 2017 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E3A131781 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=nngA9Gov; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=re/P5wGY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dprK_yWh83El for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF0E131782 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C0B20B90 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:34:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:34:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=anpj53S3aNXBV/3BHQPqO9oyupJD3b7QX9ZXNrbeF zw=; b=nngA9GovORhRWae/Pi5qq7IH493VAqvNEefIbund2bPrM0+Am77sFuHuB UqZXJ3w+XZ+5FQEGDYupjopKirRUSd12iq8BUZrf64MJbLOPrhfkgo7zoeKuLmhm 2zTftNOQ8f2O6nogO3vXTXMPghR2Atf3qJwZV4WwRinaV3DOXtc5JFa6T0DBJjbA A479WVpxPXb4oh1d3u7IplB3Ih1Nd7TZX3V5tEDPQEv0LAZM+NyHU6paNVD5pfsE Tui9ZxmTGSG3HwiDPnhKD+XqIsCLgZbSxF6FGtjaa5LxVRFXs7/2u9A84Tq0w3LE M3NzZknGRBld7iP7DryMkf5ax9lJQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=anpj53S3aNXBV/3BHQ PqO9oyupJD3b7QX9ZXNrbeFzw=; b=re/P5wGYREAlSBhiPIoNJNkog4J4M7/+D8 uVqsjescxSndfRsa5GTIjzAmXxrx7ZuZLCwNz4mmNn1aRyF9RtvomtwI+i6jlRNh IdKnudCSBAFFJ3kNqm61KDY4no0lpBKZpLsceMVI0BLEsBCBeJuiwJNfgnOE1FiQ 7gdDVNrKvUiTlOU0d563Yya7wXAb8NpTbCd1E9mYK79/133cK0dCfXnU93avNc6x lv/y8ZwHm7poKa4odlXEoGNw8Z8vaHXUlg7sHVV7axV2MooSGd0QyLTR8OY24vVf cQGvdLxh4MD0EDeQmuuV5Hs+C8t9UKViZ4D6BRLz4wHiu5G8h14Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:qmtmWXygTJpLcpAOjI2Z3UzmSjvy7HljvBBpaXGlH7aC-42XRFZnxQ>
X-Sasl-enc: Uqgdfgc8Ryfc4tqBGje8e91yBVst5k/Is9vFOvKicrC7 1499884457
Received: from sjc-alcoop-8816.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.241.173]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C72CE7E21C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:34:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_958A9AC3-CC4B-4241-B7F1-EE31079D4792"
Message-Id: <6D02B052-4151-4718-8BAB-F9FFE8E387F1@cooperw.in>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Saturday as start day
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:34:16 -0400
References: <63406DFB-217A-4306-B717-E86D97BA2AA9@cooperw.in>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <63406DFB-217A-4306-B717-E86D97BA2AA9@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ouvkfzno8qrRhN6-EdWN9GjFFAE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:34:21 -0000

Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Based on the feedback, the IESG is going to go ahead with this change starting with IETF 100. We will also incorporate the comments received about the length of the meeting week into ongoing IESG discussions about different ways of managing the agenda time overall.

Alissa

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Based on a suggestion from Paul Hoffman, the IESG believes it would be beneficial to denote the official start of IETF meetings to be on Saturday rather than Sunday, starting with IETF 100. We believe this would be sensible given that events such as the hackathon and code sprint start on Saturday, and may make it easier for some participants to get travel approval to attend those events. This change would be reflected in the dates posted on the IETF web site and sent out in email announcements. We are not proposing any changes in terms of the scheduling of any meeting-related events, the full availability of the meeting network starting on Sunday, the opening of on-site registration, or the meeting fee.
> 
> If you have feedback about this change, please send it to ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>, or exceptionally to iesg@ietf.org <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>, by July 5, 2017.
> 
> Thanks,
> The IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email