IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls

"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Wed, 05 December 2012 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37AD21F8C9E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 01:25:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6U8zKtZUrQG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 01:25:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA9421F8C99 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 01:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qB59PqG2014815 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:25:52 +0100
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id qB59PgRk006353; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:25:52 +0100
Received: from FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.25]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:25:49 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:25:43 +0200
Message-ID: <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D022E0BE8@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGATcHjM0360Vun1KdxsHabxuSyVRPzsFqo-Ex5eqvJ4w@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls
Thread-Index: Ac3SaDvUttnfHPaFSkCEiK1IwKJy1wAYcDPA
References: <50BE3721.90004@dcrocker.net> <CCE40691.1531%Hannes.Tschofenig@nsn.com> <CAF4+nEGATcHjM0360Vun1KdxsHabxuSyVRPzsFqo-Ex5eqvJ4w@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: ext Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Dec 2012 09:25:49.0073 (UTC) FILETIME=[833E3010:01CDD2CA]
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 1381
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1354699553-00006291-791D25B9/0-0/0-0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 08:01:42 -0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:25:58 -0000

Hi Donald, 

> It's a question of costs and benefits. The cost of the IETF Announce
> posting is small. There are not that many of them and I don't find
> them to be a burden.

How many conference calls as part of working group activities did you
organize in the last two years?

Maybe there are not that many because the overhead is too high to
organize them. 

> The benefit in openness and transparency is
> large.

Are working group activities not open and transparent in your view?

> Thus the answer is simple and the policy should remain as it is
> for now. If conditions change, it can certainly be revisited.
How many conference calls of working groups you are not subscribed to
did you attend? 

Ciao
Hannes


> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
> <Hannes.Tschofenig@nsn.com> wrote:
> >> The concept is simple:  a time-specific gather is a meeting.
> Meetings
> >> require prior announcement beyond the working group.
> >
> > I am not against a meeting announcement. I am suggesting to announce
> the
> > meeting where the audience is -- in the working group.
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email