IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls

Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Wed, 05 December 2012 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <dougb@dougbarton.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E7321F8C00 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:09:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iq+iOZVLv3B6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCECE21F8BFE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 19:09:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 20281 invoked by uid 399); 5 Dec 2012 03:09:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@12.207.105.210) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 5 Dec 2012 03:09:29 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 12.207.105.210
X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us
Message-ID: <50BEBAF8.4010900@dougbarton.us>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:09:44 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@nsn.com>
Subject: Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls
References: <CCE40691.1531%Hannes.Tschofenig@nsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <CCE40691.1531%Hannes.Tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 03:09:51 -0000

On 12/04/2012 09:59 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>> The concept is simple:  a time-specific gather is a meeting.  Meetings
>> require prior announcement beyond the working group.
> 
> I am not against a meeting announcement. I am suggesting to announce the
> meeting where the audience is -- in the working group. 

Hannes,

You've stated your perspective several times now. Each time a
non-trivial number of people have spoken up to say that they understand
your perspective, and that while under certain circumstances it may be a
reasonable one; that's not how the IETF operates.

Can we move on now?

Doug

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email