Re: IETF Challenges

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sun, 03 March 2013 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526BD21F86CD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 04:38:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6v+B6V4Cy2iQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 04:38:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-da0-f45.google.com (mail-da0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B748A21F86BC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 04:38:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-da0-f45.google.com with SMTP id v40so2099458dad.18 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 04:38:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=MPbHi1mRBh796jARDhGn2Pjq5P+7mNKi2NhWJ4SSPLY=; b=BjskpQKW7+AXxI7b//yn883i/QCYGL/CxwGhlf6PYxKC0csi+2xtUZcA/EUuxYuYut 0XmexH3UpHHfc8OGiH4HGx9v4OwFifW6tOIipasFDQ6ApB7kuEvMQQelViW+/eqeXvpt iwrg4O1S9VlROoYYh5gt2KbcnclRkqEQKchIShcUjNAV61rYyA3bOuY8LYbK60rDdI+1 sGjwbmwXm5jVeEYL/2k+LM3A9WeF12SpahqcAdhIf2binszk4+TDTZ9nj267qSQgShEw zENbKK40maHlsXXI94q/dc1pd91D4c5rk/fITaDj9pelVLWVGdftIjzearDKICjWYbPY pklw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.185.33 with SMTP id ez1mr27204389pac.93.1362314282567; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 04:38:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.33.132 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 04:38:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:38:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ895NASR-tcvu588VZnZgdD73vPipnvLyue+yRHvhAS9WA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Challenges
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:38:03 -0000

>> I wonder if he's basing this on the main discussion lists.  There
>> actually don't seem to be that many people from Japan and China
>> posting here on IETF-discuss, despite considerable activity from
>> those corners of the globe on individual working group mailing lists.

>Perhaps they prefer to do real work.

For me that am from Africa, I do prefer to join the WGs in IETF, but
it seems that most meeting of IETF don't come to Asia or Africa nor
provide there a conference room with the live meetings ( IETF needs to
work with Internet Society Chapters in thoes places). I think it is a
challenge to IETF's Works/I-Ds to consider real
inputs/suggestions/applications of Asia and Africa communities to the
IETF. Under the IETF role it is very easy of WG chairs to ignore
minority participants of large communities.

AB