Re: IETF Challenges
t.p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> Sun, 03 March 2013 08:59 UTC
Return-Path: <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC0521F8634 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 00:59:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.848, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7LlfIApJwklH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 00:59:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CC521F8622 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 00:59:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail97-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.254) by CO9EHSOBE029.bigfish.com (10.236.130.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 08:59:19 +0000
Received: from mail97-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail97-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8871C6801BE; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 08:59:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.250.69; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:AMXPRD0711HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -17
X-BigFish: PS-17(zz542Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275ch1033IL17326ah8275dhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839h947hd24hf0ah1177h1179h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah139eh13b6h1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h184fh1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h304l1155h)
Received: from mail97-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail97-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1362301157373900_32656; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 08:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO9EHSMHS024.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.248]) by mail97-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584AF88005B; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 08:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AMXPRD0711HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.250.69) by CO9EHSMHS024.bigfish.com (10.236.130.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 08:59:17 +0000
Received: from DBXPRD0210HT004.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.181) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.242.9.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.263.1; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 08:59:16 +0000
Message-ID: <011201ce17ec$e1a60e40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <2810D400-BA42-40B6-AFDB-C308283C7330@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: IETF Challenges
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 08:55:33 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.253.181]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 08:59:21 -0000
Jari The day after your post I read that " The 2012-2013 IETF nomination process has not yet filled the Transport Area Director position despite several attempts to broaden the pool of nominees. " which to me sums it up. ADs are the critical resource, on the critical path in project management terms, and this other post reflects that challenge. How can the load on ADs be reduced? Can technology be leveraged to increase their productivity? and suchlike. This I see as the real challenge. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net> To: "IETF discussion list" <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 9:17 In my new role, I thought it would be useful to start a discussion about the challenges we are facing, and call for input on things that the IETF community feels should be addressed. Here are my initial thoughts: http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/03/ietf-challenges/ But please tell your thoughts. Is there something that bothers you in the IETF process, meetings, support systems, is there something that we should improve? Which of these issues do you think the leadership should take a priority in addressing first? And what technical challenges do you see us addressing in the coming years? Jari
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- IETF Challenges Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF Challenges Hector Santos
- Re: IETF Challenges SM
- Re: IETF Challenges Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: IETF Challenges Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF Challenges Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Challenges t.p.
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: IETF Challenges Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: IETF Challenges joel jaeggli
- Re: IETF Challenges SM
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: IETF Challenges Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Challenges Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF Challenges joel jaeggli
- Re: IETF Challenges Dale R. Worley