Re: IETF Challenges
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Sun, 03 March 2013 20:33 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0D321F8871 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:33:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.048, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ei2mYt2VnOKZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:33:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com (mail-pb0-f43.google.com [209.85.160.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D18621F886D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md12so2689435pbc.30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:33:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/Y36V79x3bsLFvsuxdLVO5irbUQmP2TPqmMwDiYKdZU=; b=cLCmXjdmbqHkjDeu6XCN2VoM7360Aa/0uKWbLynEAVVpJBW3DH88pFKBigBKdTtsM5 +sjZc7Gbn+TYsCTHuRM9ylcgqXDqoGO18sdEAN+OXsTzZ9Tovig5fbz9pJp8q8yK5N1n SMM40tgGsxz6OiLlARpC0cEGpZVwTvCZw91jM6EPRXzKEutGCFOkYAhM1eoG5/ITsG8Z hd+B5gZOnnNEZyoAXZto6UzYDZAYKHEo/lZy70JL1EHO8w52issTG2/I/gyzuGm+A6+V 2DxYkNpEMnzhUzN+peCZ9RQGwd7UbHCAOmlwL9BUvQfSiyHxW08zrq+BFL+eCwNpe19J skYQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.158.2 with SMTP id wq2mr28898637pab.113.1362342793936; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 12:33:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.33.132 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:33:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130303065447.0bb7d300@resistor.net>
References: <CADnDZ895NASR-tcvu588VZnZgdD73vPipnvLyue+yRHvhAS9WA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130303065447.0bb7d300@resistor.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:33:13 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-adDaFjFZtpaq3xF_-gDAyfKq34JQkvThqa-B_k4tsgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Challenges
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 20:33:24 -0000
Hi SM comments below, On 3/3/13, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote: > Here is a quote from someone in Africa who was involved in other I* > bodies (not the IETF): > > "Africa has many educated people with a great local perspective; however > they have little global influence. I find that it is not enough to > invite > people to forums where it is a known fact that they will not contribute > meaningfully." I don't beleive that, but that maybe true if we know the reasons or background of that experience, > Abdussalam, I'll ask an unfair question: How will the Internet > Society Chapters in those places contribute meaningfully to the IETF [1]? It will be meanigful contribution if there was advise, willing, and guide from the IETF, but I never claim I have solutions just thoughts, it can be another challenge answer to the question by this thread, > > At 05:05 03-03-2013, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: >>My experience is that there is a huge difference between different >>WGs. Some I have sent email to without response, then actually >>emailed the WG chair and asked if the topic of my email was within >>the WG scope, still no answer. This is an example of an WG that's >>hard to get into, seems populated by people who mostly discuss >>within an already established group and where nobody seems to bother >>that someone comes in with an idea to even give them a reply that >>their idea is not on topic or alike. > > Yes. As an anecdote I had a somewhat similar experience. It does > not bother me and I am not inclined to do anything about it. This is a discourage that the IETF SHOULD solve and monitor. If I was an IETF chair I will fire thoes WG Chairs that don't respond to posts on their WG list. Very discourage/wrong behavior of such organisation that ignores an input or a participant. > >>Some other WGs are populated by people who are very happy to respond >>and discuss to anyone who comes up with something, which is very >> welcoming. > > Yes. Thoes WGs are the stars of the IETF, which encourage and make the challenges become innovation, All the best AB > Regards, > -sm > > 1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg62861.html > >
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- IETF Challenges Jari Arkko
- Re: IETF Challenges Hector Santos
- Re: IETF Challenges SM
- Re: IETF Challenges Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: IETF Challenges Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF Challenges Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Challenges t.p.
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: IETF Challenges Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: IETF Challenges joel jaeggli
- Re: IETF Challenges SM
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: IETF Challenges Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: IETF Challenges Michael StJohns
- Re: IETF Challenges Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF Challenges joel jaeggli
- Re: IETF Challenges Dale R. Worley