IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Challenges

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Sat, 02 March 2013 23:42 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A145221F85BD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 15:42:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HQDvDDfrQkUu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 15:42:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1D021F85B6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 15:42:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=374; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1362267768; x=1363477368; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=0R+NdELFXL2XjNO66+FieI9hopL4HX/kFlOblRvftb8=; b=lvJsc1UwA5cCFjyIAKDc5TxxAVyJDcW9nMRsVoRZxJv9k11BxAkRwfQR LS64Kkznzfpx044a4P2XeD513B9cL0Kk5bAUHyGFIlEbvJE7vYrnXAn4r NdpcSTcuY5foBvnz6syyTmnmEsylOfYd74ZDHa/P/vrcBuMzzieDcyppv 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlMFANOMMlGtJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABFhgm8RXwWc4IfAQEBAwE6NAsFCwIBCCIUEDIlAgQOBQiIBQawL5EUjmoCMQeCX2EDpzKDCIIn
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,769,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="180064393"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2013 23:42:47 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r22Ngl3N011569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 2 Mar 2013 23:42:47 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.206]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:42:47 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: IETF Challenges
Thread-Topic: IETF Challenges
Thread-Index: AQHOFybT6HiH3AjLO0S0d4TNXynrnJiTQScAgAA0aAA=
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:42:46 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B7BC427@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <2810D400-BA42-40B6-AFDB-C308283C7330@piuha.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20130302111036.0a89a000@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130302111036.0a89a000@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.117]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1019893069886B43B97F2B86C8B4D82C@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org list" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:42:48 -0000

On Mar 2, 2013, at 12:35 PM, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:

> If the IETF has become very international it would be apparent from the mailing list archives.  A quick look would show that there weren't any messages from people from China or Japan [1].

I'd suggest you redo your analysis. It doesn't have a lot to do with reality in the working groups I'm in.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email