Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF
Eduardo Mendez <eduamendez@gmail.com> Tue, 18 October 2005 02:34 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERhIp-0007vZ-A6; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:34:11 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERhIn-0007vU-5n for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:34:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA25577 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:34:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.207]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERhUE-0004pe-4N for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:45:59 -0400
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n1so1046217nzf for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RQrwTB/3gVbWc6fIF6vWQz7NDQ2zfbTzk9K/ANuS6A632k8h+q7Lu4zFl98zkTxlt99tgGA+T5275Zj3G9zui1qgwhG0npUHdFdGCqzatcyWDFXR+EnZnQaygFSmYUioAaX5z7lOcjgGRQi3atzv23xjCiSIgDRm2KCC/KQJI/Q=
Received: by 10.36.36.19 with SMTP id j19mr20746nzj; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.194.15 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 19:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <8ee2e61f0510171934m420f114fx@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:34:04 +0200
From: Eduardo Mendez <eduamendez@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4353EA1B.2010206@WEIJax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8ee2e61f0510151351q11626c4fi@mail.gmail.com> <20051017134307.GB6043@nokia.com> <8ee2e61f0510170727o69743ccew@mail.gmail.com> <8ee2e61f0510170732u22a94cf1l@mail.gmail.com> <4353BFA8.6080305@WEIJax.com> <8ee2e61f0510171004u1439945bx@mail.gmail.com> <4353EA1B.2010206@WEIJax.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b4a0a5f5992e2a4954405484e7717d8c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Mrs. Sandy, I think you are misunderstanding what I say. I do not complain about any culture. I say that there are different legal cultures. I say that if IETF is not only American it cannot only use the American legal culture. I say that there are legal systems where: - only the Prosecution can call someone "accused" - you accuse no one, but complain about sufferances. - the jury says if these were ture sufferances. - if you complain wrong you pay for that. this protects the right of the people. I only see that RFC 3683 permits to defame someone. I say I am not sure - even in the USA - this is OK. I say there are countries where RFC 3683 is illegal. It is a private rule. Among 4000 documents. Mr. Dean never signed appoval. 2005/10/17, Sandy Wills <sandy@weijax.com>: > Welcome to "Anglo-Saxon" culture, If this is personal it gives a odd signal. Is this the IIETF culture? > I know, > that's what "W" wants for the US, but that's why we won't invite him > back again as president. I do not understand what this has to do with an RFC? > He is not accused (that I know > of) by any person or government of any "crime" whatsoever, worthy of > punishment, fining, jailing, execution, etc. Then you did not read his post. In many cultures it is difamatory. > He is, however, "accused" by a club member of constantly disrupting > club meetings by interrupting discussions to make speeches about > something that is NOT IETF BUSINESS and CANNOT BE FIXED BY THE IETF. This is wrong: he can complain. Not accuse. At least this is the way other cultures may see it. > Because of this, in just under a month, the IESG is going to make a > decision about whether to bar Dean from posting to IETF mailing lists > for [some time / forever]. I see you did not read RFC 3683. > I don't personally know all the facts in this case. I'm not on the > IESG and won't be involved with the decision, except the same way you > are: making sure that everything is fair, honest, and open. Yes. And this is why there is no reason to dispute. All I say is: before applying RFC 3683 let make sure it is legal. In every country we want Members. Including the USA. Let be sure the way some use it will not cost us a lot. If there is a risk, how to correct it. This seems quite reasonable? Eduardo Mendez _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF Melinda Shore
- Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RF… Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call unde… Marc Manthey
- Was: Last Call under RFC 3683 [...] Frank Ellermann
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call unde… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call unde… David Kessens
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call unde… Spencer Dawkins
- Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call und… Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Noel Chiappa
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Dave Singer
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Scott W Brim
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Scott W Brim
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF bill
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF Ted Hardie
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF william(at)elan.net
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF Bill Manning
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Alexis Turner
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Dean Anderson
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Dean Anderson
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF shogunx
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Sandy Wills
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Dean Anderson
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Sandy Wills
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Doug Ewell
- Please be relevant and professional [Re: Fwd: Can… Brian E Carpenter
- Objective statements about behaviour [Re: Fwd: Ca… Brian E Carpenter
- Correcting error about RFC 3683 [Re: Fwd: Can the… Brian E Carpenter
- Correcting errors about IETF [Re: Fwd: Can the US… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Correcting errors about IETF [Re: Fwd: Can th… JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Correcting errors about IETF [Re: Fwd: Can th… Dean Anderson
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Dean Anderson