Please be relevant and professional [Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF]

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Tue, 18 October 2005 06:56 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERlP5-0005zT-8t; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:56:55 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERlP1-0005z8-UQ for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:56:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA08438 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:56:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate4.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERlaS-0002qV-Sr for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 03:08:42 -0400
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate4.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9I6uXrU169214 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 06:56:33 GMT
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.216]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j9I6uXZO232974 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:56:33 +0100
Received: from d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9I6uXMA012370 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:56:33 +0100
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9I6uXRb012358 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:56:33 +0100
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-129-216.de.ibm.com [9.145.129.216]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA69398 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:56:32 +0200
Message-ID: <43549C9F.2090502@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:56:31 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510172046170.14779-100000@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510172046170.14779-100000@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Please be relevant and professional [Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Yet again people are sending messages to the list which deviate
from their claimed subject line and involve statements about
individuals which seem to have little relevance.

I request everybody to stop sending such messages, and to
stop replying to them since that only amplifies the disruptions.

    Brian Carpenter
    IETF Chair

>>XXX, your presumption of being above the law and able to act without any
>>regard or recognition of responsibility and obligation is exactly how
>>organizations get into legal trouble.
>>
>>The IETF is an activity of the ISOC. The ISOC is incorporated in the US, has a
>>corporate charter, bylaws, and various duties imposed on it.  It is subject to
>>US law, and it seems, Massachussets state law.  We'll see.
> 
> 
> Officially, this might be the case.  De facto, is is something much
> larger, with much greater girth on the globe.
> 
> 
>>[** BTW, YYY just recently sent me a nasty gram, 6 years later. For
>>those of you who don't know the story (most of you who aren't Nanog members),
>>YYY was fired from ZZZ in 1999 after Nanog members encouraged him to abuse
>>our relays.
> 
> 
> Sounds like corporate law enforcement to me.
> 
> 
>>This was at a time when Nanog members claimed that no laws applied
>>to the Internet.
> 
> 
> Was he persecuted for anything?


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf