Correcting error about RFC 3683 [Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF]

Eduardo,

As you have already been told, this is not a prosecution.
It is an internal procedure of the IETF, intended to
protect our work against alleged disruption.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter
IETF Chair

Eduardo Mendez wrote:
> I corrected error (underlined). Apologies.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Eduardo Mendez <eduamendez@gmail.com>
> Date: 17-oct-2005 16:27
> Subject: Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683
> concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))
> To: David Kessens <david.kessens@nokia.com>
> 
> 
> 2005/10/17, David Kessens <david.kessens@nokia.com>:
> 
>>I don't appreciate your suggestion that there could be another motive
>>for reissuing the Last Call as the explanation in the note that
>>accompanied the reissued Last Call message was quite clear in it's
>>motivation.
> 
> 
> Mr. David,
> I am sorry you do not appreciate.
> This is may be we do not share the same culture.
> Every culture is to be respected.
> 
> For your information. There are other countries when the procescutor
> makes such a mistake it kils the procescution. This protects the
> rights of the accused person.
> 
> What you did increases the rights of the accusator.
> You also are the victim, a law maker, a judge, and an appeal judge.
> There are countries where you must ask another AD to procescute.
> 
> There are countries where one is not allowed to say:
>  "Mr. X did wrong".
> One must say:
> "Mr. X seems to have done wrong".
> Or Mr. X can sue you and win.
> Everyone is innocent; except when the Judge said he is not.
> And there is no appeal.
> ---------------------------
> Sorry: I mean. "and you stay innoncent until the end of the appeal".
> 
> So, sorry if I hurt you.
> 
> Eduardo Mendez
> 
> 
>>The Last Call was reissued since the first message was inadvertently
>>send to the the IETF announce list (where all other IETF Last Call
>>messages are send) instead of the IETF discussion list as specified by
>>RFC 3683. It seemed prudent to reset the Last Call timer to avoid any
>>conflicts on whether the Last Call would have been of sufficient
>>duration.
> 
> 
> NB. You created a conflict on duration: it is too long.
> "Sufficient" is a word like if you had made your mind as a Juge.
> In true Justice lawyers would use it.
> Your rights can be defended only if you defend the rights of everyone?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf