Objective statements about behaviour [Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF]
Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Tue, 18 October 2005 08:06 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERmU4-0002KJ-DL; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:06:08 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERmU2-0002II-U1 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:06:06 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA11602 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:05:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERmfW-0004hn-F5 for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:18:00 -0400
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9I85rrO097580 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:05:53 GMT
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.7) with ESMTP id j9I85qr4226446 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:05:52 +0200
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9I85qXZ025621 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:05:52 +0200
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9I85quD025605; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:05:52 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-129-216.de.ibm.com [9.145.129.216]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA46612; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:05:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4354ACDE.7010504@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:05:50 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eduardo Mendez <eduamendez@gmail.com>
References: <8ee2e61f0510151351q11626c4fi@mail.gmail.com> <20051017134307.GB6043@nokia.com> <8ee2e61f0510170727o69743ccew@mail.gmail.com> <8ee2e61f0510170732u22a94cf1l@mail.gmail.com> <4353BFA8.6080305@WEIJax.com> <8ee2e61f0510171004u1439945bx@mail.gmail.com> <4353EA1B.2010206@WEIJax.com> <8ee2e61f0510171934m420f114fx@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8ee2e61f0510171934m420f114fx@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Objective statements about behaviour [Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
It beats me how a thread about possible visa issues changes into a thread about RFC 3683. > I only see that RFC 3683 permits to defame someone. Not in the least. It is about how the IETF can protect itself against forms of behaviour that disrupt the IETF's work. It is aimed at objective statements about behaviour. We are currently testing this mechanism for the first time. After we have finished this test, I have no doubt there will be a need to discuss the mechanism. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brian E Carpenter IETF Chair _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF Melinda Shore
- Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RF… Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call unde… Marc Manthey
- Was: Last Call under RFC 3683 [...] Frank Ellermann
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call unde… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call unde… David Kessens
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call unde… Spencer Dawkins
- Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call und… Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Noel Chiappa
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Dave Singer
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Scott W Brim
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Scott W Brim
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF bill
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF Ted Hardie
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF william(at)elan.net
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF Bill Manning
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Alexis Turner
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Dean Anderson
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Dean Anderson
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF shogunx
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Sandy Wills
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Dean Anderson
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Can the USA welcome IETF Eduardo Mendez
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF Sandy Wills
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Doug Ewell
- Please be relevant and professional [Re: Fwd: Can… Brian E Carpenter
- Objective statements about behaviour [Re: Fwd: Ca… Brian E Carpenter
- Correcting error about RFC 3683 [Re: Fwd: Can the… Brian E Carpenter
- Correcting errors about IETF [Re: Fwd: Can the US… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Correcting errors about IETF [Re: Fwd: Can th… JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Correcting errors about IETF [Re: Fwd: Can th… Dean Anderson
- Re: Fwd: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call… Dean Anderson