IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Tue, 18 October 2005 05:47 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERkJx-0000mF-EX; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:47:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERkJu-0000m7-Ip for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:47:30 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA05287 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:47:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERkVN-0001FO-7t for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 01:59:22 -0400
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2005 22:47:14 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,226,1125903600"; d="scan'208"; a="353438835:sNHT4422898190"
Received: from imail.cisco.com (imail.cisco.com [128.107.200.91]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j9I5lBub001895; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [212.254.247.3] (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp4264.cisco.com [10.61.80.167]) by imail.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9I5veSq002929; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:57:41 -0700
Message-ID: <43548C5D.2060306@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:47:09 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (Macintosh/20051006)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: john.loughney@kolumbus.fi
References: <zpyJkYVpWJCV.B2lJNcsZ@smtp.kolumbus.fi>
In-Reply-To: <zpyJkYVpWJCV.B2lJNcsZ@smtp.kolumbus.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=467; t=1129615062; x=1130047262; c=nowsp; s=nebraska; h=Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=Subject:Re=3A=20IETF=20Meeting=20Venue=20Selection=20Criteria| From:Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com>| Date:Tue,=2018=20Oct=202005=2007=3A47=3A09=20+0200| Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DUTF-8=3B=20format=3Dflowed| Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit; b=O52OCEv5Ix4z6LiYOsvpobxMvpi4n/ig/9mBI8PKtspsixf13E88h9W9pSIiy6ms/5Xhiirq 6XgLV6iSI1vpxJIm7HVORvUPJGJGrkp3QlurK+440HSP3xe4YogwNKPwOcyaS02OUkXuPTTeg2y 4L0/L2iQERnC1M2T4vxgeJKw=
Authentication-Results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( message from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

John,

> I've talked to quite a few folks that have been unable to attend meetings in the US because of visa issues. 

Is it your or other people's position that we should no longer have 
meetings in the U.S.?  If not, what's the practical benefit of the 
guidance?  If so, we should go back to the chair's poll on just how many 
participants we would lose.

Is it your or other people's belief that this document will cause venues 
to be booked more in advance?  If so, on what do you base this belief?

My point: I think we've got requirements on the brain, engineers that we 
are.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email