RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> Mon, 17 October 2005 14:26 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERVwe-0004dg-H1; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:26:32 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ERVwb-0004db-38 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:26:30 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA15303 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:26:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from colibri.verisign.com ([65.205.251.74]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERW7w-0007hf-Db for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:38:12 -0400
Received: from mou1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (mailer1.verisign.com [65.205.251.34]) by colibri.verisign.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9HEPgAq016359; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:25:42 -0700
Received: from MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.25.13.157]) by mou1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:25:42 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:25:42 -0700
Message-ID: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD376D5460@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Thread-Topic: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
Thread-Index: AcXQ4Tb5uLbHEJ6SR82lP9tpINxF5AAT96OAAH0llBA=
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To: "DENG, HUI -HCHBJ" <hdeng@hitachi.cn>, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>, Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2005 14:25:42.0549 (UTC) FILETIME=[A7B03C50:01C5D326]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: jianping@cernet.edu.cn, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, ietf@ietf.org, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, wuhq@catt.ac.cn
Subject: RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

I very much doubt that this would be an issue in practice. 

>From an anti-censorship point of view I would much rather that the IETF
visit countries where the Internet is controlled.

I doubt for a moment that the authorities in any country would be so
obliging as to allow several thousand networking experts to map out
their security controls.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of "DENG, HUI -HCHBJ"
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:23 PM
> To: Ole Jacobsen; Melinda Shore
> Cc: jianping@cernet.edu.cn; Avri Doria; ietf@ietf.org; JORDI 
> PALET MARTINEZ; wuhq@catt.ac.cn
> Subject: RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
> 
> > > - MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are so 
> > > stringent as to make it impossible or even extremely 
> difficult for 
> > > some participant to attend.
> > > 
> > > - MUST NOT be held in a country with restrictions on freedom of 
> > > expression, especially if these extend to the blocking of 
> web sites 
> > > or any other censuring of personal communications.
> > > 
> > > - MUST NOT be held in a country were local participants would be 
> > > under pressure to support national technical policies on 
> threat of 
> > > imprisonment or other punitive actions, for their opinions.
> > > 
> > > - MUST NOT be held in a country were local participants 
> would need 
> > > government approval to attend.
> 
> >The "restrictions on freedom of expression" is a little more 
> tricky and 
> >one could argue that the IETF should not be in the business 
> of trying 
> >to change policy at that level. China comes to mind as a 
> place we could 
> >not go by this rule, but a lot of people seem to belive that 
> >"constructive engagement" is more successful than boycott.
> 
> Please allow me speak something personally, 
> 
> I come from Beijing China,  continuously attended IETF 
> meeting six times. (freshman), hosted Chinese participants 
> parties each time. There are more than 40 chinese attendees 
> made a getting together in last IETF Paris Meeting right 
> after Technical Plenary on thursday.
> 
> This February, we hosted a workshop which is related to IETF 
> MIP6,MIP4, NEMO working group.
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mip6/current/msg02353.html
> In Feb. 2006, we are currently planing to continue to host 
> this workshop which is related to IETF more working groups. 
> If you are interested in help to bridge between IETF and China.
> Please don't hesitate to contact with us.
> 
> Regarding to " Blocked  sites, redirected dns, registration 
> and arrest of bloggers etc"
> I already have to explain too many times with people who come 
> from IETF to China.
> What I asked is just one question " Do you have any problem 
> to visit any website or using VPN in China".
> The answer what I heard is just "No",  What I recommend is 
> please come to China and see what she really is other than 
> judgement based on other'other'other peoples talking.
> 
> I understand some people who come from freedom country would 
> like to visit both "Anti-China website and terrorist", then 
> there will be not reachable, in that case what I can suggest 
> is " Please be patient just only 1 week (IETF meeting time), 
> after you return back to your freedom country, please 
> continue to do Anti-China acitivity as you like.
> 
> This weekend, Formula 1 will be held in Shanghai, China 
> http://www.formula1.com/
> 
> Next next week, 3GPP2 meeting will be held in Beijing, China.
> Others like 3GPP, and ITU, OMA, IEEE intermediate meeting 
> were already held in China.
> 
> 2008 Olmpic Game, Beijing, China
> http://en.beijing-2008.org/33/28/homepage211612833.shtml
> 
> 2010 World Expo, Shanghai, China
> http://www.expo2010china.com/expo/english/eu/index.html
> 
> Then my question goes to "why IETF could not come to China?"
> 
> If IETF think that China is too poor and technology is pretty 
> lag behind, I agree and accept, but we chinese really 
> expected that more help could come from IETF to change ours life.
> 
> Shall we make a more "constructive engagement"
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -Hui
> 
> Disclaimer:
> The contents of this e-mail, and its attachments, if any, are 
> confidential and may be protected by law against any 
> unauthorized use.  If you have received this e-mail by 
> mistake or have reason to believe that you are not the 
> intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail 
> as soon as possible and delete it from your computer system 
> immediately thereafter.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy this 
> e-mail or attachment or disclose the contents to any other 
> person.  While we have made every effort to keep our network 
> virus free, we take no responsibility for any computer virus 
> which might be transferred by way of this e-mail.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf