RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

"Gray, Eric" <Eric.Gray@marconi.com> Fri, 14 October 2005 18:53 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQUgf-00042P-DB; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:53:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQUgc-000422-VW for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:53:47 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04937 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:53:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com ([169.144.68.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQUrM-0006Q6-U5 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:04:55 -0400
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9EIrWrP012521; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:53:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com (uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25479; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:53:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <THFPHDC2>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:53:31 -0300
Message-ID: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0C885F90@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com>
From: "Gray, Eric" <Eric.Gray@marconi.com>
To: 'Avri Doria' <avri@acm.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:53:29 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d0bdc596f8dd1c226c458f0b4df27a88
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Avri,

	Perhaps a better approach would be to have a
list posted somewhere of interdicted sites - along 
with an explanation of the specific reasons why 
they've been interdicted.

	This would both remove all ambiguities and 
allow members who would like to have a site removed 
from that list to determine extactly what they would 
have to address to do so.

--
Eric

--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org 
--> [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
--> Avri Doria
--> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:38 PM
--> To: Jari Arkko
--> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
--> Subject: Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
--> 
--> 
--> 
--> On 14 okt 2005, at 13.19, Jari Arkko wrote:
--> 
--> > Freedom of expression is another matter, and would be slippery
--> > slope indeed. I think in most cases we would be better off
--> > being open and constructive, and helping more people understand
--> > what our views are than to refuse contact.
--> >
--> 
--> 
--> I agree, and that is why I tired to include specific 
--> issues, though  
--> admit that part needs greater specificity.  I think the slippery  
--> slope can be avoided by designating specific acts that make a site  
--> unacceptable.
--> 
--> One can safely argue that everywhere censures something, however,  
--> some well known practices are more serious then others.  Blocked  
--> sites, redirected dns, registration and arrest of bloggers etc    
--> stand out as things that can be stated specifically and not 
--> subject  
--> to much interpretation (ok, as anyone who knows me knows, i 
--> believe  
--> everything is subject to some degree of interpretation).
--> 
--> As for being open and constructive, I agree that in 
--> principle this is  
--> a good goal.  however, i beleive it is a goal that exists 
--> on its own  
--> slippery slope, a slope that ends in appeasement and 
--> acquiescence to  
--> practices we would prefer not to support.  I think a better 
--> path to  
--> openness is to set a good example and to invite all to participate  
--> and to make it easy for them to participate (ref. the visa 
--> rules - i  
--> also advocate subsidized attendance fees - but that is 
--> another issue).
--> 
--> a.
--> 
--> 
--> _______________________________________________
--> Ietf mailing list
--> Ietf@ietf.org
--> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf