Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com> Fri, 14 October 2005 19:39 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQVP1-0001y0-Ge; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:39:39 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQVOz-0001xs-9a for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:39:37 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA06803 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:39:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nwkea-mail-2.sun.com ([192.18.42.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQVZk-0007TG-Ks for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:50:46 -0400
Received: from eastmail2bur.East.Sun.COM ([129.148.13.40]) by nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9EJdXHT003498; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thunk.east.sun.com (thunk.East.Sun.COM [129.148.174.66]) by eastmail2bur.East.Sun.COM (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id j9EJdW0t014962; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:39:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thunk.east.sun.com (8.13.4+Sun/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9EJdWMf002585; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:39:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@sun.com>
To: Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <D15A63B4-D01B-4850-9A6B-E9952FC45E97@acm.org>
References: <BF74AC74.1338C6%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <D15A63B4-D01B-4850-9A6B-E9952FC45E97@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1129318772.2260.91.camel@thunk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6.323
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:39:32 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 11:58, Avri Doria wrote:
> I think there needs to be some mention of requirements such as:
> 
> - MUST NOT be held in a country whose visa requirements are so  
> stringent as to make it impossible or even extremely difficult for  
> some participant to attend.

An important factor worth stressing, IMHO, is the time required to apply
for & issue a visitor visa suitable for a short-term visit.  If the time
required isn't predictable in advance and measureable in small numbers
of months, that itself is a barrier to participation.
			
But I might back off on a hair on the phrasing -- "several
participants"?

Let's be realistic -- we're talking about government bureaucracy here. 
Is there any country out there which doesn't occasionally "randomly"
deny or significantly delay granting a visitor visa?  A single incident
ought not to preclude us from returning.  A pattern of exclusion, on the
other hand, would be a matter of concern.

						- Bill













_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf