Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Fri, 14 October 2005 15:49 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQRo6-0002Vc-0H; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:49:18 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EQRo3-0002VX-VV for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:49:16 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25302 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:49:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from peewit.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([152.78.68.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQRym-0001Xi-Hw for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:00:21 -0400
Received: from login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (login.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102:230:48ff:fe23:58df]) by peewit.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9EFmnI9020194 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:48:49 +0100
Received: (from tjc@localhost) by login.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j9EFmnb21738 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:48:49 +0100
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:48:49 +0100
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20051014154849.GH16294@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <BF74AC74.1338C6%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <20051014081514.GA23583@nic.fr> <434FC316.1070206@zurich.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <434FC316.1070206@zurich.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@smtp.ecs.soton.ac.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by peewit.ecs.soton.ac.uk id j9EFmnI9020194
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 04:39:18PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Excuse me Stéphane, but I do not find these comments constructive.
> Anyone planning an international meeting for 1000+ people has
> to take a great many things seriously that you seem to think
> are amusing. We had some serious security problems in Paris,
> for example.

I agree.  The thing is, my personal view is that one of the best places to
get work done is Minneapolis, but if you suggested that as a venue out of 
the blue, most people would think you were a few cans short of a six pack.

We should be very open minded in venues to consider, and try to capture
what it is about those venues that seem to work in the requirements doc.

The fact that Minneapolis was 4 degrees F last time I was there didn't
really matter.  In fact coming from a country that now rarely sees snow
it was actually very enjoyable :)

Tim

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf